DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | NORTH Gary S. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | PARK Ian C. | V V V D D | V V V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 3 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | D V V V D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 5 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 7 | PAN Colin | V V D V V | V V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 8 | GANA Jr Jorge M. | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 9 | CARTER Austin L. | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | SO Lorenzo | D D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 11 | HE Lawrence | V V D V D V | V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 12 | SU Caleb | V D D V V | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 13 | SNYDER IV William B. | D D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 14 | WHEELER Daniel | V V D V D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | JAKEL Sophia N. | V D D D D | V V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 16 | CAO Brad | D D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 17 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | V V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
| 18 | JORDAN Anton | V V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
| 19 | WITTER Catherine A. | D D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | SAUNIER Cameron | V V V D D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 21 | SWENSON Keane J. | V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 22 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | D V V V D | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | TIKHONOV Iliya | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | CAO Albert | D D V V V D | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 25 | DAN Rex | D V V D V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | TIKHONOV Daniel | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | JAKEL Alysa C. | D V D D D V | D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
| 28 | ZHANG Caden | D D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 29 | ROBERT Oliver | D D D D V | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 30 | ZHANG Sen | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 31 | CSAJBOK Attila | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 32 | QIU Emily | D D D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 0 | -3.0 |
| 33 | CHENH Justin | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 34 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 35 | LEE Aiden | D D V D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 36 | YU Jason | V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 37 | SZIEDE Kieran | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 38 | MACTOUGH Ben | D D V D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
| 39 | SUNKARA Vishnu | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.