AFM Super Regional SYC/RJCC/ROC Div1A/Vet

Cadet Men's Foil

Saturday, October 7, 2023 at 11:30 AM

Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHOI Ethan 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 12%
2 HOSKERI Anik S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 78% 32%
3 WU Alber Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 25%
3 LING XIANGQIAN 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 5%
5 MA Bryant 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 63% 14%
6 NGUYEN Martin 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 37%
7 RASMUSSEN Sage 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 15%
8 WU Trevor 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 22%
9 PONS Diego 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
10 LE Jacob H. 100% 100% 98% 87% 54% 18% 2%
11 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
12 LIU Zixian (Aaron) 100% 100% 98% 84% 53% 18% 2%
13 LO Preston 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 59% 15%
14 MARTIN IV Elmer D. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 59%
15 LAK Isaac 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 13%
16 CHEN Matthew 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
17 LIN Youlong 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70% 23%
18 LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 34%
19 KETTELLE John 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 12%
20 HUANG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 18%
21 RAJ Jay 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 55% 13%
22 ZHANG Jacob 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 18% 3%
23 CORTRIGHT Skipper 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
24 DERRICK Blake 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 23%
25 BAE Eugene 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 9% 1%
26 YI William 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 46% 11%
27 LU Kevin 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 24%
28 KIM Harrison 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 13% 1%
29 FUKUDA Diego 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 16%
30 MORROW Brenden 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 44% 10%
31 KIM Daniel Y. 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 10%
32 YU ZiRun (Kinton) 100% 100% 98% 80% 39% 9% 1%
33 LING Eddie 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 38%
33 REICHEL Ezra 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 36% 8%
35 LI Matthew 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 13%
36 MA Andrew 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 55%
37 PARK Rion 100% 100% 100% 99% 85% 41% 8%
38 NICOLETTI Luca 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 27%
39 KRYLTSOV Michael 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 41%
40 DINSAY Kristjan 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 47%
41 SCHIENEMAN Valentine 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
42 PINCHENG Yao 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 33% 6%
43 EDISON Ansel 100% 100% 99% 88% 59% 24% 4%
44 WONG Evan 100% 100% 95% 76% 42% 13% 2%
44 LI Toby 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 41% 9%
46 ROZALSKI Eli 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 40% 9%
47 SISINNI Leonardo 100% 98% 83% 48% 17% 3% -
48 PARK Sky 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 58% 13%
49 BIELER Mason 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 7%
50 BORG Matthew 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
51 ZHONG Maxwell 100% 100% 94% 70% 32% 7% 1%
52 WANG Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 68% 22%
53 ZHOU Ryan 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 12% 1%
54 LING Carson Jr 100% 99% 90% 56% 18% 2% -
55 RUBIN Max 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 10% 1%
56 LIU William 100% 100% 94% 74% 40% 12% 2%
57 TSAY Jordan R. 100% 100% 97% 84% 51% 17% 2%
58 SAH Steven 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 15% 1%
59 CHAN Joseph 100% 100% 94% 66% 28% 6% -
60 FUKUDA Brando 100% 97% 82% 49% 18% 3% -
61 GORDON William L. 100% 100% 96% 72% 26% 4% -
62 YUE Jackson 100% 87% 52% 18% 4% - -
62 PARK William 100% 99% 86% 53% 18% 3% -
64 MAK Osman K. 100% 97% 76% 35% 8% 1% -
65 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 100% 100% 95% 73% 36% 8% 1%
66 ORNELAS Matteo 100% 99% 88% 57% 22% 4% -
67 CHANG Jonathan 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 26% 4%
68 LI Jett 100% 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2%
69 NOFZIGER Bennett 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
70 CHANG Eric Jonathan 100% 100% 97% 75% 32% 5% -
71 PARK David 100% 99% 83% 43% 12% 2% -
72 TSOI Spencer 100% 98% 81% 36% 7% 1% -
73 UPENDER West 100% 97% 78% 42% 12% 1% -
74 HE Bourne 100% 84% 45% 13% 2% - -
75 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 52% 15%
76 LI Richard 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 8% 1%
77 RAUTUREAU Arthur 100% 100% 98% 84% 50% 16% 2%
78 ELKOUSY Zain al Din 100% 100% 97% 80% 44% 12% 1%
79 DUNLAP Ezra 100% 82% 41% 11% 2% - -
80 CHANG Nathan 100% 75% 34% 8% 1% - -
81 RAUTUREAU Hugo 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
82 PARK Steve (Sangmin) 100% 100% 93% 72% 38% 11% 1%
83 CHOI Benjamin 100% 100% 97% 79% 40% 9% 1%
84 YANG Charles 100% 99% 93% 67% 31% 8% 1%
84 GILMARTIN Colin 100% 99% 82% 40% 9% 1% -
86 QIU Zhaocheng 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 12% 1%
87 ZHANG Andrew 100% 71% 30% 7% 1% - -
88 CHUN Dashel 100% 98% 85% 53% 19% 3% -
89 XU Jiajun 100% 61% 18% 3% - - -
90 ALBERS Asher 100% 80% 29% 5% - - -
90 FLANAGAN Miles 100% 75% 29% 6% 1% - -
92 HENSTOCK Willem 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 5% -
93 LUI Justin 100% 93% 57% 19% 3% - -
94 DENG David 100% 97% 77% 40% 12% 2% -
95 NGAI Julian 100% 97% 79% 43% 15% 3% -
95 KALAMAS Nikolas 100% 84% 47% 15% 3% - -
97 ANDRADE Cedric 100% 92% 46% 10% 1% - -
98 FOY Grant 100% 62% 20% 3% - - -
99 TOYOFUKU Ethan 100% 93% 53% 12% 1% - -
100 MCKEE Calvin 100% 93% 56% 14% 1% - -
101 ZHANG Jayden 100% 91% 43% 10% 1% - -
102 ONG Nicholas 100% 93% 64% 26% 6% 1% -
103 AGRAWAL Niki 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 7% 1%
104 TUAN Evan 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 24% 4%
105 ZHAN Kevin 100% 82% 43% 13% 2% - -
106 COONAN Seamus 100% 86% 40% 9% 1% - -
107 YUAN Jonathan 100% 39% 5% - - - -
108 NISHIHIRA Tyler 100% 72% 29% 6% 1% - -
109 LIANG Ethan 100% 44% 9% 1% - - -
109 KAUSHISH Rayirth 100% 86% 48% 15% 2% - -
111 WANDJI Noah 100% 95% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
112 LEE Christopher 100% 43% 8% 1% - - -
113 ARCARA Evan 100% 45% 9% 1% - - -
114 NG Andrew 100% 92% 55% 17% 3% - -
115 RODRIGUEZ Tyler 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% -
116 KROVIDI Arush 100% 87% 51% 17% 3% - -
116 WONG Braxton 100% 42% 8% 1% - - -
118 KAISER Lucas 100% 85% 35% 6% - - -
119 SUN Neo 100% 27% 3% - - - -
119 MA Oliver 100% 43% 8% - - - -
121 MANIKTALA Suvir 100% 86% 46% 13% 2% - -
121 GREENEBAUM Oliver 100% 97% 80% 46% 15% 2% -
121 PEZESHKI Oliver 100% 44% 7% - - - -
124 PETROV Mikhail 100% 67% 21% 3% - - -
124 BANUELOS Dario 100% 25% 2% - - - -
126 WOO Noah 100% 53% 12% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.