Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% |
2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 32% |
3 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 25% |
3 | LING XIANGQIAN | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
5 | MA Bryant | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 14% |
6 | NGUYEN Martin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
7 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% |
8 | WU Trevor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
9 | PONS Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
10 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
11 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
12 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
13 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 15% |
14 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
15 | LAK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
16 | CHEN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
17 | LIN Youlong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 23% |
18 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
19 | KETTELLE John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 12% |
20 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
21 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
22 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
23 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
24 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
25 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
26 | YI William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 11% |
27 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 24% |
28 | KIM Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
29 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
30 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
31 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
32 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
33 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
33 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
35 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 13% |
36 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 55% |
37 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 41% | 8% |
38 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 27% |
39 | KRYLTSOV Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
40 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
41 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
42 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
43 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
44 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
44 | LI Toby | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
46 | ROZALSKI Eli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
47 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
48 | PARK Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 13% |
49 | BIELER Mason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
50 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
51 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
52 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
53 | ZHOU Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
54 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - |
55 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
56 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
57 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
58 | SAH Steven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% | 1% |
59 | CHAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - |
60 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
61 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | 4% | - |
62 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
62 | PARK William | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
64 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
66 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
67 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% | 4% |
68 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
69 | NOFZIGER Bennett | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
70 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 5% | - |
71 | PARK David | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - |
72 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 98% | 81% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - |
73 | UPENDER West | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
74 | HE Bourne | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
75 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
76 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
77 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
78 | ELKOUSY Zain al Din | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
79 | DUNLAP Ezra | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
80 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
81 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
82 | PARK Steve (Sangmin) | 100% | 100% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
83 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | 1% |
84 | YANG Charles | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
84 | GILMARTIN Colin | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
86 | QIU Zhaocheng | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
87 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
88 | CHUN Dashel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
89 | XU Jiajun | 100% | 61% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | ALBERS Asher | 100% | 80% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
90 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 75% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
92 | HENSTOCK Willem | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - |
93 | LUI Justin | 100% | 93% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
94 | DENG David | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
95 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
95 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
97 | ANDRADE Cedric | 100% | 92% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
98 | FOY Grant | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
99 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 93% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
100 | MCKEE Calvin | 100% | 93% | 56% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
101 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 91% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
102 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
103 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
104 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
105 | ZHAN Kevin | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
106 | COONAN Seamus | 100% | 86% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
107 | YUAN Jonathan | 100% | 39% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
108 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
109 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
109 | KAUSHISH Rayirth | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
111 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
112 | LEE Christopher | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
113 | ARCARA Evan | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
114 | NG Andrew | 100% | 92% | 55% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
115 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
116 | KROVIDI Arush | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
116 | WONG Braxton | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
118 | KAISER Lucas | 100% | 85% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
119 | SUN Neo | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
119 | MA Oliver | 100% | 43% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
121 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 86% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
121 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
121 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
124 | PETROV Mikhail | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
124 | BANUELOS Dario | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
126 | WOO Noah | 100% | 53% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.