Ryan Fieldhouse - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
| 2 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | |
| 3 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
| 3 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
| 5 | MICKO Fritz K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% |
| 6 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | LOISEAU Eliott | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 40% | 6% |
| 8 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% | |
| 9 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% |
| 10 | LI Chenyu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 6% | |
| 11 | DHAL Leon | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | 1% |
| 13 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
| 14 | VEZMAR Evan H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 15 | SILVERS Ari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 29% |
| 16 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 2% |
| 17 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 66% | 16% |
| 18 | JONES Reilly | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 21 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | FU Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | YANG Zeke | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 21% |
| 25 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 26 | MISHRA Milan B. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | ELYADERANI Paxon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
| 28 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | FRANGER Max | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | VUILLEMIN Gregoire | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | APANASEWICZ Ethan | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 35 | BARFORD Giovanni | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 37 | BRADFORD Ethan | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 38 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | BORUCKI Grant | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | SHOEMAKER Oliver | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | RIECK Brennan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | TIMEK Jan | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 43 | MALEADY Sean | 100% | 95% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | KARAMAGA Ganza | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
| 45 | MOHAMED Sabir | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | PETROVICH Alexandar | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | STOKER Elliott | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | SAHA Sayan | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GROOTHUIS David | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | RITTERBUSCH Timothy | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | FELICIANO Damien | 100% | 91% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 52 | VANOYEN Dominick | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | COHEN Henry | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 54 | PATEL Aayan | 100% | 80% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.