SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
2 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | LIN James G. | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
3 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
5 | KEE Andrew L. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | KNIZHNIK David | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | MILLER Aidan A. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | YAO Bradley | D D V V D V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
9 | BAS Liam | V V V V V V | V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
10 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
11 | LIGOS Alex M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
12 | HE Xiangrui | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
13 | JIMENEZ Lukas | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
14 | PYO Michael M. | V V V V D V | V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
15 | YAP Nathan | D V V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
16 | ORLOV Dmitriy | V D D D V V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
17 | TANG Albert | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | MAO Lucas | V V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
19 | MOHAMED Murad | V D V V V V | V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
20 | LIU Derek | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
21 | XU Andy P. | V V D V V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
22 | HUANG Eythan | D V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
23 | BADLANI Dev | D D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
24 | LEE Brendan | D D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
25 | TIKHAEV Alexander | V V D V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
26 | PO Oliver | D V V V D V | V D | 5.2 | 4 | -1.2 |
27 | SONG Noel | D V V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
28 | GLEBA Nico | D V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
29 | KOVACS Wyatt | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
30 | SHAPIRO Leon | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
31 | WANG Winston | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
32 | TRUBETSKI David | V D V D D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
33 | NICOLSON William | D V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
34 | LI Ayren | V V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
35 | LARA Diego | V V V V D V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
36 | LEE Jonah | V D V D V V | D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
37 | MILLER Jordan | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
38 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | D V V V D V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
39 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | V V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
40 | CHENG Ethan | D V V V V D | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
41 | REZA Farazi | V V V D D V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
42 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | V V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
43 | WONG Jackson | V D V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
44 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | V V D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
45 | GHEDINI Luca | D D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
46 | AKYAMAC Bora | D V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
47 | SURESH Rohan | D V V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
48 | SHAO Eric | V V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
49 | CHEN Kyle P. | D V V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
50 | TJON Calum | D D V D V V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
51 | MILLER Dillon | V V D D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
52 | MAGALONG William | D D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
53 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | D V D V D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
54 | LIU Ryan | V D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
55 | YU Stephen | D V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
56 | CHO Xzander | V D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
57 | PECK Quinn | V D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
58 | WANG Brian | D V D D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
59 | SUN Henry | V D D D V D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
60 | MUNDY Ezra | D D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
61 | HOLLIS Sean | D D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
62 | HUNTER Phillip | D V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
63 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
64 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | D D D D V D | V D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
65 | LEE Eugene | D V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
66 | BAI Brian | D V V D V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
67 | WOODCOCK Henry | D D V V V D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
68 | NICOLL James | D D V D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
69 | LI Allen | D D V D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
70 | BONOMO Sebastian J. | V V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
71 | BLACK Zachary | V D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
71 | BAKSHI Aman | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | BONTHA Aadit | V V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 2 | +1.3 |
74 | JURMAN Therin | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
75 | KENNEDY christo | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
76 | DHANOA Kian | V D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
77 | XU Brian | D V D D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
78 | TAM Kyle | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
78 | SEIB-LEVINSON Conrad | V D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
80 | BASKIN Lukáš | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
81 | JANNEY Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
82 | SHAMBARGER Graham | D V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
83 | COSSROW Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
84 | BHAN Amar | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
85 | VALENTINE David | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
86 | OEHLER Mac | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
87 | PEREZ Logan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
87 | NADOL Sam | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
87 | BUNDUS Luca | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
90 | BRENNAN Connor | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
90 | EGE Nathan | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.