NYA Sports and Fitness Center - Newtown, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HASSAN Mohamed H. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | WELCH Kyle J. | V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
3 | ZOBEL Eric H. | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | ROSE Ben | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
5 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
6 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
7 | YU Vinni | V V D V D V | V V V D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
8 | HAN Changhee | D V V V D D | V V V V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
9 | SIMA Congyu Josh | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
10 | HE Xiangrui | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
11 | LIN Michael | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
12 | LI Eric | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
13 | KLOTZ Isaiah | V V V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
14 | TAHOUN Mostafa | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
15 | TEMPLE Jackson | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
16 | LANG Dong Lin | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
17 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
18 | ZHAI Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
19 | PO Oliver | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
20 | LEE Jonah | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
21 | LIN James G. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
22 | BADLANI Dev | V V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
23 | MATSAKH Philip | V D V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
24 | WANG Mason | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
25 | TAN Aidan | V V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
26 | MILLER Jordan | V D V V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
27 | RADOSLAVOV Ivan-Asen | D V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
28 | GRIGORIEV Eduard | D V V V D V | V D | 5.5 | 4 | -1.5 |
29 | SCHLESINGER Nathan | D V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 |
30 | YAO Bradley | D V D V V D | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
31 | CHEN Kyle P. | D V D D V D | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
32 | LEE Eugene | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
33 | POPESCU Tudor | V D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
34 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | V V V V V D | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
35 | AHN Jun | V V V D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
36 | LIGOS alex M. | V D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
37 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V V D D V V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
38 | HU Robin | V V D V D V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
39 | TANG Albert | V D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
40 | O'BRIEN Jack K. | V D V V D V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
41 | AKYAMAC Bora | V D V V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
42 | ARCE Andrew W. | V V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
43 | YOON Dylan | D V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
44 | DOBBINS Evan W. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
45 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | D D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
46 | JIANG Owen | D V D D V V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
47 | LEE Brendan | V D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
48 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
49 | XU Ethan | V V V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
50 | LI Matthew | V D D D V V | V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
51 | PETERSON Dale | D V D V V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
52 | WU DING-JUN | D D D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
53 | WU Dawei | V D V D D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
54 | TANG August L. | D D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
55 | PITERBARG Maxim | V D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
56 | TJON Calum | D V D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
57 | LEE Jason N. | D D D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
58 | SONG Noel | D D V D D V | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
59 | LI Ayren | D V D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
60 | KAPOOR Aayan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
61 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | V D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
61 | KONG Luculentus X. | V D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
63 | CHO Xzander | D D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
64 | FLANAGAN James | D D D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
65 | MILLER Andrew | D V V D D V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
66 | SHAPIRO Leon | D V D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
67 | TAM Kyle | D D D D V V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
68 | MCLAUGHLIN Ryan | D V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
68 | LIU Ryan | D D V V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
70 | FENG Michael | V V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
71 | BAI Brian | D D V D D V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
72 | GE Daniel | D V D D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | GARCIA HERNANDEZ Lucas | V D D V D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
74 | WOHLERS Trevor | D D V D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
75 | SURESH Rohan | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
76 | TANG Alexander L. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
77 | CHENG Ethan | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
78 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | D D V D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
79 | HAYLON Caleb | V D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
80 | VO Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
81 | LAO Kevin | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
82 | TANG Terry | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
83 | AMRANI David | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
84 | YANG Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
85 | ZHENG Harrison | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
85 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
85 | SABATINO Patrick | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
88 | BARBANEL Joseph | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
89 | TESSMAN Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
90 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.