Phoenix, AZ - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LA ROSA Federico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 53% |
2 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 31% |
3 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 2% |
5 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 54% | 13% |
6 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
7 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
8 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
9 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
10 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
11 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
12 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% |
13 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 2% |
14 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 14% |
15 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% |
16 | AIBEL Hudson J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
17 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
18 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
19 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
20 | LEE David Y. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
21 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
22 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 5% |
23 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
25 | HOLDERNESS Landon | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
27 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | KHER Roan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
29 | WOO Christian | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - |
30 | PAI Lakshan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
31 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
32 | KIM Banseok | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
33 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
34 | NGUYEN Liam | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
35 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
36 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
37 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
38 | NAM Michael | 100% | 83% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
39 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | CHOI Isaac | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | - |
41 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 97% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
42 | OH Jaden | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
43 | SPINA Joseph B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
44 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
45 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
46 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
47 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
48 | CHANIN Liam R. | 100% | 80% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
49 | OH Joshua | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.