MAPLEWOOD , NJ - MAPLEWOOD, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 2 | KRAVIT Connor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 3 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% |
| 3 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 5 | ZHANG YuJian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 6 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 7 | GUI Runlin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 8 | DOLMETSCH Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
| 9 | LIBSON Tazman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 10 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 11 | WU Jason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | MOTIR Lucas D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 13 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
| 14 | GARCIA-ROGERS Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 35% |
| 15 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 16 | MUNROE Shane | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 17 | GARCIA-ROGERS Kyle J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 18 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | WYATT Seth | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | TUCKER Owen J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 52% | 21% | 4% |
| 22 | CRONIN Darragh J. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 23 | SIMPSON Patrick | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | LAI Coby | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | BINDAS Odinn A. | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
| 27 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | WANG Eric S | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | ROWE Jason | 100% | 77% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | WIEDERHORN ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 31 | LIEF Isaac R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 32 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | WADE Grayson | 100% | 93% | 69% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 34 | KRONROD Tal | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 13% |
| 35 | MAGDA Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 36 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | DIAS-LALCACA Kieran P. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | MAAS Sean H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | LIU Jack | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | CHEN Austin | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | GROSSMAN August | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 43 | PRAKASH Nikhil | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HA Daniel | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 45 | ALVANEZ Franki | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | KUMAR Aidan | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | CONNELLY Asa D. | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | PAHLAVI Kamran | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | CRANN Sean | 100% | 90% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | COTAJ Andrew | 100% | 98% | 76% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | JENNINGS Adin | 100% | 83% | 41% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | KUTTRUS Max D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 37% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | ZARETSKY Daniel A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 54 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 55 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 56 | STANLEY Dominick | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.