Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Fieldhouse) - None
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% |
2 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
3 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% |
3 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
5 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
6 | NORMILE Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
7 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% |
8 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
9 | LI Jade | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
10 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
11 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
12 | GAO Victor | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
13 | SOLARZ Arthur | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
14 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 9% |
15 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
16 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
17 | RADZIKOWSKI Sam | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
18 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
19 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% |
20 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
21 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% |
22 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% |
23 | LI Ryan | 100% | 97% | 74% | 31% | 6% | - |
24 | WANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% |
25 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 6% |
26 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 14% |
27 | CZEPLA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
28 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 12% | 1% |
29 | GIORDANO Zach | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
30 | OCONNOR Paul | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
31 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
32 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
33 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
34 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
35 | DEGRUCCIO Johnny | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% |
36 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 26% | 3% |
37 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - |
38 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
39 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
40 | LI Ray | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
41 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 18% |
42 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 4% | - |
43 | LUR'YE Killian | 100% | 97% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
43 | WU Matthew | 100% | 84% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
43 | NG Nico | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% |
43 | TOMASZEWSKI Benjamin | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
47 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
48 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - |
49 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
50 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
51 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
52 | HE Yurui (Bronto) | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | LIU Jeremy | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
55 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
57 | YU David | 100% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - |
58 | LEE Kalvin | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
59 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
60 | LEE Nicholas | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
61 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
62 | LEBOWITZ Mick | 100% | 98% | 66% | 23% | 3% | - |
63 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
64 | WELCH Sebastian | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
65 | SHI Evan | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
66 | MAZEL Antonin | 100% | 76% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.