DC Fencers Club - Silver Spring, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 2 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% | |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Caden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 6 | HRAPSKY Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% | |
| 7 | CAO Brad | 100% | 100% | 88% | 52% | 12% | 1% | |
| 8 | DEUCHER Joseph H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 18% | |
| 9 | KIM kihyeon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
| 10 | CULPEPPER John (JR) R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% | |
| 11 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 12 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 14% | |
| 13 | CAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 14 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
| 15 | HE Lawrence | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 16 | CARTER Austin L. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% | |
| 19 | SOKOL Luke | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | YOO Dong Hun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | TAMULONIS Fen C. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 99% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | ZHANG Sen | 100% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 25 | USDIN Anton | 100% | 98% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | SO Lorenzo | 100% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | EVANS Allen L. | 100% | 96% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | SEIKEL Spencer | 100% | 95% | 57% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 31 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 32 | WOZNIAK Fryderyk | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | YI Nathan | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 34 | ACKLAND Matthew | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | HOOVER Natalie | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | BJERKNESS Riley | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.