University of California - Davis - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 2 | KLINKNER Richard | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 3 | JAIN Samyak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
| 3 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 5 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 6 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% | |
| 7 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 15% | |
| 8 | LIN Jason | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 9 | VERON Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 7% |
| 10 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | |
| 11 | WAGHOLIKAR Prathit | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 12 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 13 | MANA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% |
| 13 | QIAO James | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | ZHU Owen | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 18 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | REICHMANN Theo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 15% |
| 20 | TALATAM Arnav | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 22 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 24 | FAN Jordan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 25 | MA Ryan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 26 | CHEW Aedan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | SU Samuel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | LIU Daniel | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | BAKKEN Archer | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | FU Adrian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 32 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 33 | TANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
| 34 | CHU Ted | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 36 | PERSSON Leif | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 37 | HIGGINS Karl | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 38 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | WU Nathan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 40 | YU Brandon | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 41 | MANA Sameer | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 42 | GUO Luke | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 43 | LI Grayson | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 44 | MARTIN zachary | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | WANG aaron | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 47 | LIU Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 48 | GUPTA Hemansh | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | GORDON David | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | NARAYANUN Advay | 100% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | SIVASANKAR Aman | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 52 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | TEJADA-ANDERSON Emmanuel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 54 | ROZENSWEIG Aner | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.