Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WHELAN Thomas (Tony) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
2 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | 5% |
3 | JIN Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 54% |
3 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
5 | KNOX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 52% |
6 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 4% |
7 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% |
8 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 19% |
9 | WU Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 45% |
10 | JIANG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% |
11 | ZHAO Corey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 28% |
12 | BUSH Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% |
13 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
14 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
15 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | - |
16 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
17 | RICHARD Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
18 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
19 | ECKERT Kevin M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
20 | ZHANG Shawn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
20 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 13% |
22 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
23 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
24 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | - |
25 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 6% |
26 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 17% | 2% |
27 | WILSON Ian G. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | LI Ray | 100% | 93% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
29 | GERSEN Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
30 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
31 | RITTERSHAUS Bryce | 100% | 99% | 85% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - |
32 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
34 | SPRINGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
35 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | < 1% | - | - |
36 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - |
37 | SONG Changze | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
38 | MARINI Davide | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 2% | - |
39 | MARTONE Matt L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
40 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | 100% | 95% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
41 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 96% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 21% | 4% | - |
43 | WANG Zhenhai | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 6% | - | - |
45 | HOWLETT Daniel | 100% | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 2% | - |
46 | SAVORETTI Pietro | 100% | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - |
47 | WENGER Caleb | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - |
48 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
49 | MAZZOLI Julio C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
50 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 99% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | - |
51 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - |
52 | ZHANG Roland | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
53 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 7% | - | - |
54 | BRUEGGEMANN Max | 100% | 90% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
55 | SANTOS Felipe | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
56 | MARSHALL William L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
57 | PARTE Aidan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
58 | KOURE Andrew C. | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
58 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | GU Eric | 100% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
61 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
62 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
63 | SULKIS Adam | 100% | 37% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.