NEUSFA 2024 Pomme De Terre

Senior Men's Épée

Saturday, June 15, 2024 at 8:00 AM

Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SANDERS Ian W. 100% 100% 100% 100% 94% 60%
2 WU Joseph 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 63%
3 YU Colin 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 66%
3 WHELAN Thomas (Tony) 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 45%
5 MATTIS George 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 42%
6 DOELEMAN Zeno 100% 100% 100% 98% 80% 34%
7 WANG Justin 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 10%
8 SVERDLOV Seth 100% 100% 99% 93% 66% 22%
9 LONCAR Luka E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
10 PRIHODKO Max 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 39%
11 MALENFANT Vincent 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 59%
12 GAO Daniel 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 72%
13 SETO Jing 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
14 FAICCO Joseph 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 16% 2%
15 ZEBROSE Cordell B. 100% 100% 100% 95% 65% 14%
16 SHA Michael 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 12%
17 JIN Owen 100% 100% 100% 98% 82% 38%
18 XIA Dashan 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 12%
19 MELCHER Jack H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 81%
20 SONG Changze 100% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1% < 1%
21 LAI Coby 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 35% 6%
22 ZUCKER Noah L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 43%
23 TRULL A.J. 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 23%
24 CHEN Allen 100% 97% 46% 8% < 1% -
25 ZHANG William 100% 100% 100% 97% 77% 32%
26 FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. 100% 100% 99% 92% 61% 18%
27 ZHAO corey 100% 100% 100% 95% 68% 21%
28 ZHAO Zidong 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 13% 1%
29 SONG Troy 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 5%
30 DELAND Stuart R. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54% 9%
31 WU Jonathan 100% 100% 98% 86% 46% 7%
32 ROGAK Benjamin A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 35%
33 MAZZOLI Julio C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 30%
34 GOHEL Dayus T. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 64%
34 LAI Aedin 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
36 YU Samuel 100% 100% 96% 73% 31% 5% -
37 GREGORY Abram 100% 100% 100% 94% 68% 19%
38 JIANG Ryan 100% 100% 99% 88% 52% 13%
39 BURNHAM Charlie E. 100% 100% 97% 78% 35% 5%
40 ECKERT Kevin M. 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 13%
41 XIE Brandon 100% 99% 90% 59% 17% 1%
42 ZHANG Dinghao 100% 92% 45% 10% 1% -
43 SENERTH Ian J. 100% 98% 84% 47% 9% 1%
44 PAYNE Massimo 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8%
45 SPRINGER Michael 100% 100% 100% 94% 70% 25%
46 FENG Du 100% 98% 79% 40% 10% 1%
47 HE Xiangrui 100% 100% 99% 90% 59% 20% 2%
48 ROWLAND Hudson G. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 23%
49 ZHANG Shawn 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 9%
50 BELLIVEAU Raven C. 100% 100% 100% 94% 67% 17%
51 FEINBERG James Y. 100% 84% 44% 11% 1% -
52 HOWLETT Daniel 100% 93% 64% 27% 6% -
53 RICHARD Owen 100% 100% 100% 99% 87% 37%
54 PRIHODKO Andrew 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
55 KOEPPEL Levi E. 100% 99% 92% 69% 35% 9% 1%
56 CHALLAGULLA Manu 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6% -
57 HU Robert J. 100% 100% 99% 89% 59% 19% 2%
57 HELMY Richard 100% 98% 83% 47% 15% 2% -
59 JACOVINO Jonathan S. 100% 100% 94% 61% 14% 1%
60 JENNINGS Adin 100% 100% 96% 76% 35% 6%
61 ZOGRAFOS Nicholas 100% 76% 27% 3% - -
62 RUSSELL Edward 100% 99% 84% 42% 10% 1%
63 BELLIVEAU Emmett S. 100% 99% 90% 60% 21% 2%
64 WENGER Caleb 100% 99% 91% 64% 28% 6% 1%
65 GLUSHKOV David 100% 76% 22% 3% < 1% -
66 PAN Anthony 100% 98% 80% 38% 8% 1% -
67 SMITH Troy H. 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 3%
68 RITTERSHAUS Bryce 100% 93% 63% 22% 4% -
69 BEALS Alden 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 23%
70 MACARTY Jordan T. 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 14%
71 BAJAJ Nakul 100% 95% 60% 15% 1% -
72 ZELIN Sam J. 100% 100% 81% 30% 3% -
73 LIU Jeremiah W. 100% 98% 82% 43% 10% 1%
74 GAO "George" Xiaojiang 100% 85% 45% 11% 1% - -
75 BRUEGGEMANN Max 100% 88% 50% 16% 3% - -
76 HOWARD Jackson 100% 97% 79% 42% 12% 2% -
77 YIN Chujun 100% 91% 49% 10% 1% -
78 MCMILLAN Jackson V. 100% 91% 56% 16% 1% -
79 MONTESI Eric 100% 100% 97% 76% 34% 5%
80 ZOU Xianyang (Max) 100% 100% 94% 69% 29% 3%
81 RADZIKOWSKI Sam 100% 69% 25% 4% - -
82 TORRES Gianni 100% 94% 62% 17% 2% -
83 PLOTNICHENKO Vsevolod 100% 100% 95% 71% 29% 4%
84 SANTOS Felipe 100% 100% 92% 55% 16% 2%
85 DJONOUMA Toyohm 100% 94% 64% 21% 3% -
86 PALLADINO Ben T. 100% 97% 79% 43% 12% 1%
87 GACS Kalman J. 100% 100% 97% 75% 26% 2%
88 SHONEMAN Sam 100% 96% 70% 30% 6% -
89 PETERSEN Zachary 100% 88% 49% 13% 2% -
90 DOWD Peter L. 100% 76% 32% 6% - -
91 ALVES PEREIRA Francisco Xavier 100% 90% 57% 19% 3% -
92 MASSE Jack 100% 87% 42% 9% 1% -
93 THORDARSON Paul (Thor) J. 100% 100% 99% 87% 46% 9%
94 BRADSHAW Carter 100% 98% 86% 52% 17% 2% -
95 SANCHEZ-BUSTOS Anasazi 100% 92% 62% 25% 5% 1% -
96 TRAN Spencer 100% 100% 99% 89% 55% 15% 1%
97 KUBATIN Anton V. 100% 94% 70% 36% 11% 1% -
98 HANCOCK Lloyd D. 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 16% 1%
99 SCHWARTZ-HINDS Andrew 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
100 ORESKOVIC Olivier 100% 88% 51% 14% 1% -
101 LIBERT Zachariah 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% 1%
102 HU Jansen T. 100% 97% 72% 27% 5% -
103 PEZZINO Matthew 100% 83% 42% 10% 1% -
104 NALLICHERI Ayaan 100% 68% 24% 3% - -
105 WANG Zhenhai 100% 83% 44% 12% 2% -
106 STEIN Philip 100% 64% 18% 2% - -
107 KIM Nathan 100% 77% 34% 8% 1% -
108 CARLETON Matt 100% 93% 64% 27% 6% -
109 MARSHALL William L. 100% 85% 43% 9% 1% -
109 HILLEGEIST Ash 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 1%
111 THOMPSON Ian 100% 91% 58% 20% 3% - -
112 MORI Seneca 100% 94% 68% 31% 7% 1% -
113 REELS Eric J. 100% 95% 74% 39% 12% 2% -
114 SHAPIRO Natan 100% 56% 15% 2% - - -
115 MECHREFE Anthony 100% 78% 30% 5% - - -
116 LI Ray 100% 62% 19% 2% - -
117 REINEKE Alexander 100% 62% 20% 3% - -
118 BELLIVEAU Shane 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 6% -
119 REINEKE Gerhard 100% 41% 8% 1% - -
119 STELTENKAMP Neal 100% 97% 81% 43% 9% -
119 HERRICK Michael 100% 58% 15% 2% - -
122 WHITE Aidan 100% 30% 3% - - -
123 MASSE Dean 100% 8% - - - -
124 BUISINE Sebastien 100% 45% 8% 1% - -
125 LIN Yufei 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% - -
126 BUISINE Aurelien 100% 38% 5% - - -
127 MACKENZIE Delaney 100% 94% 68% 30% 7% - -
128 KAIN Brad 100% 84% 42% 9% 1% -
129 KOPPENHEFFER Rowan 100% 87% 48% 11% 1% -
129 SEILS Aether 100% 45% 6% - - -
131 PETE Landon 100% 74% 30% 6% - - -
131 LONADIER Robert 100% 61% 16% 2% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.