Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LI AYDEN | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 2 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 3 | LI linze | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 48% | 42% |
| 3 | IM Tyler | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 5 | CAO Donald | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% |
| 6 | TANI Tino | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 7 | WANG Tiger | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 14% |
| 8 | KROON Landon | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% |
| 9 | ZHANG KAIQI | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 27% |
| 10 | SUN Andrew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% |
| 11 | KOZLOFF Wyatt | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% |
| 12 | KANG Matthew | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 13 | KANG Jeremy | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 51% | 40% |
| 14 | WONG David | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 7% |
| 15 | LIU Daniel | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LEE Nathan Uju | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 17 | KOVACHEV Martin | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
| 18 | IYER Neil | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% |
| 19 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 20 | LUC Cedric | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 21 | LUC Linkin | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 21 | IRVINE Patrick | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | LIU Yijin | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
| 24 | MINASIAN Mason | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 25 | BROWN Andrew | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | VO Blake | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 17% | 2% |
| 27 | ANUMULA Aryan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | CHEN Cooper | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | HO Alden | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | CHI Everett | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 31 | XIAO Brayden | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 32 | BRUM Charles E. | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 33 | RONG Jasper | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 34 | WINTERSET Mason | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | BEKDJANOV Arthur | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 36 | LI Yidong A. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 45% | 13% |
| 37 | YPHANTIDES Alexander | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 38 | SHEN Hudson | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | MOORE Greyson | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 40 | LEE Brian | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 41 | WESTMORELAND-BROWN Cole | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | LI Ryan | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | VAN ROY Ray | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 44 | WANG David | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 45 | AMEN Oscar | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | LIANG Preston | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 47 | SUN Eon | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 49 | SUN Andy | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 50 | KEIM Jackson | 2% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | HERRERA Stefano | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | TALLARICO Leonardo | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 53 | NGO Emerson | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 45% | 18% |
| 54 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 55 | CHEN Aaron | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 56 | AIKMAN Kai | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 57 | QI Jeremy | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 58 | FU BRANDEN | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 59 | LEE Bill King | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | AN Chris (Siyoung) | 38% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 61 | DOOLEY Atticus | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 62 | WANG Xuren | 13% | 40% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | LIN Ethan | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 64 | TENG Lucas | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 65 | LEE Winston | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 66 | CHAN Troy | 7% | 32% | 41% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | HORN Diodorus | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | CAO Chong | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 69 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 69 | FUGATE Logan | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 71 | GUO Jonathan | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 72 | LIU Paul | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | NAZIF Alexander | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | XIE Justin | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 75 | YUE Ivan | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
| 76 | GONZALEZ Paul | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 77 | WALKER Camden | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 78 | HAN Kyle | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 79 | SINGH Swaran | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | XU Ethan | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | LEE Alexander | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 81 | ESTEVES Andres | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | ROBERTSON Beaudry | 28% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 84 | PONOTH Arnav | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | WU Dawei | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 86 | BRADIC Andreja | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 86 | TAN Daniel | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 4% | 31% | 40% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 89 | YANG Jake | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 90 | ELSAYED Yahia | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 91 | SU Eric | 2% | 16% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 91 | YU Joshua | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 93 | ZHANG Albert | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 94 | JOURNET Robert | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 95 | COOK Ridgely | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 96 | GUO ATTICUS | 4% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 96 | KIM Enoch | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 98 | LI Sky | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.