Ontario Convention Center - Hall A&B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUC Cedric | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 2 | KANG Jeremy | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 3 | GREENSTEIN Viktor | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 56% |
| 3 | VO Blake | - | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 5 | LI Ryan | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
| 6 | HRISTOV Nickolas | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 40% | 39% |
| 7 | LEE Bill King | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 8 | CAO Chong | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 9 | KIM Junseong | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 10 | QI Jeremy | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 11 | FISCHER Noel | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% | |
| 13 | WU Kaiden | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 14 | WANG David | - | 5% | 28% | 44% | 20% | 2% | |
| 15 | GUO Jonathan | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | JI Derek | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | LIU Baichen (Matthew) | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 18 | LIN Ethan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | CHEN Aaron | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 20 | WONG Alexander | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 21 | FAN Yuen | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | LVOVSKIY Roman | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 23 | PARK Jayden | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 24 | DUFF Michael | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 25 | SU Eric | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 26 | GOTTSCHALK Theodore | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | LEE Jayden | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | HAN Kyle | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 29 | YUE Ivan | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 30 | DENG Richard | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% | |
| 31 | DESAI Arthav | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 1% |
| 32 | FAN Yuchen | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | WU Dawei | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 34 | TABANCAY Cole | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 35 | TAN Daniel | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 36 | LIU Chun Shing | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | WANG Henrik | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | SLOAN Ethan | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 39 | HSIEH Sebastian | 3% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | IRVINE Cooper | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LIU Paul | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHAN Troy | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 43 | BELHE Hridhaan | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHANG Hanzhi | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | EKAMBARAM Rithik | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 46 | QI Zach | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 47 | ZHU yinxi | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 28% | 4% | |
| 48 | WU August | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 49 | CHEN Donovan | 10% | 46% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | HULL Brandtley | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | DUBIN Jake | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | KIM Derek | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | SAHA Aadi | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 54 | DING Orlando | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 55 | YUAN Alan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | ZHANG Connery | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | CHEUNG Evan | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 58 | WANG Darren | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 59 | ESTRADA Leo | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 60 | LEI Isaac | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 61 | GUO ATTICUS | 5% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 62 | LEE Kyle Sung Ju | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 63 | LI Sky | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | HSIEH Maxwell | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LOVELL Jackson | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 66 | BOURCIER Rowan | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.