Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WU Jonathan | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | IARIKOV Nicholas | D V V D V V | V V V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
3 | LAI Aedin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | DOYON - VERDON William | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | MACARTY Jordan T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
6 | SVERDLOV Seth | V D V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
7 | PARK Nicholas | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
8 | CAUCHY Eliot | V D V V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | DUKO Phillip | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
10 | SAVORETTI Francesco | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
11 | SOKOL Luke | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | LIU Yueri | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
13 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | BRODSKY Julian | V V V D D V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
15 | KARIMOV Amir | D V V D V D | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
16 | DOUBOV Andrew | D V V V D D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
17 | MANN Jake R. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
18 | TSE Maxwell | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
19 | WOLFE Alex | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
20 | SONG Troy | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
21 | LEE Aiden | V V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
22 | LAI Boden | V V V V V D | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
23 | REPIC Oliver | V V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
24 | HU Robert J. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
25 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
26 | DURKIN Tristan E. | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | D V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
28 | LEE Aiden | D D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
29 | KRISHNAN Skanda | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
30 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | D V V V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
31 | WANG Tony | V V D V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
32 | SHOUSHA Yassin | D V D V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
33 | BEALS Alden | D V V V V V | D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
34 | DOYON - VERDON Gabriel | D V V V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
35 | CHEN Jayden | V V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
36 | CHEN Leonardo | V V D V V V | D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
37 | CHEN Jun Ho | V D V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
38 | GOON Tristan Yang | V V V V D D | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
39 | SHA Michael | V D D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
39 | ANAFI Ari | V V D V D V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
41 | EVANS Joseph | V V V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
42 | ALEXANDER Christopher | V V D V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
43 | YU Samuel | V V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
44 | TESFAYE Elias | V V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
45 | CHEN YiHeng | V V V D D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
46 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | D V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
47 | LIU Adam | V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
48 | WONG King-Yee | V V D D D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
49 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | D D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
50 | TRAN Spencer | V V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
51 | SUN Lucas | V D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
52 | DAN Rex | D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
53 | DOWD Peter L. | V D D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
53 | LEE Anton | D D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | HEADRICK Jack | D D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
56 | BOUDREAUX James | D D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
56 | CHEN Luowen | D D V D D V | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
58 | ZANELLI Ben | D D D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
59 | XIA Dashan | D V D D V D | V D | 4.2 | 2 | -2.2 |
60 | PAN Anthony | D V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
61 | XIE Brandon | D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
62 | HOWELL Liam | D V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
63 | CHEN Edward | V D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
64 | MEN Junda | D D D D V D | V D | 3.6 | 1 | -2.6 |
65 | SAVORETTI Pietro | V D V D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
65 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | V V V D D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
67 | POCHATKO Christian | V D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
68 | RVACHEV Michael | V D D D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
69 | MASTAKOURIS Petros-Stone | D D V D D V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
70 | RIM Eugene | D D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
71 | JAMISON Tre | V D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
72 | LI Jade | D D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
73 | LIN Nathan | D D D V V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
74 | HELMY Richard | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
75 | LIN Junyi | D V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
76 | MANTINAOS Constantinos | V V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
77 | LEE Wyatt | D D V D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
78 | WHEELER Jackson | V D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
79 | ACAR Devin | D D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
80 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | D D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
80 | AGUIRRE Diego | D D D D V D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
82 | AGRAWAL Krishna | D D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
83 | DAGLI Sai | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
84 | NILSEN Mark | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
85 | AU Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
86 | LIU Jeremiah W. | D D D D D D | D | 3.1 | 0 | -3.1 |
87 | LYCHKO Maksym | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
88 | HE Lingyun Matthew | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
89 | WANG Charles | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
89 | JOEL Irenov | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
89 | LEE Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
89 | MORSS Dashiell | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
89 | GU Eric | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
94 | URBAN Leo | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
95 | TINAWI Luay | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
96 | KIM Samuel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.