Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TSE Maxwell | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 2 | LIU Adam | - | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 3 | ATKINS Levi H. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 3 | DUKO Phillip | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
| 5 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 6 | ANAFI Ari | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% |
| 7 | PAN Anthony | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 10 | ZHAO Pierce | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | LI Jade | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 12 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% | |
| 13 | SOKOL Luke | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% | |
| 14 | ACAR Devin | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 15 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% |
| 16 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 17 | KIM Henry | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% | |
| 18 | XIA Dashan | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 19 | YANG Alex | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | SUN Lucas | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 21 | KIM Gene | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
| 22 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | MORI Seneca | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | CUMMINGS Owen | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 25 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 3% | 17% | 46% | 34% | |
| 26 | RIM Eugene | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 27 | KARIMOV Amir | - | - | 5% | 24% | 46% | 25% | |
| 28 | NOOL Alexander | 9% | 35% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 29 | SONG Changze | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 30 | WANG Charles | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 31 | TRAN Spencer | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 10% | |
| 32 | CHEN Jayden | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 33 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 34 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 35 | HENNESSY Levon | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 36 | TESFAYE Elias | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | LIU Jeremiah W. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% |
| 38 | CHEN Edward | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 39 | LIN Michael | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% | |
| 40 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | LEE Anton | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 42 | GLUSHKOV David | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 43 | TSIEN Richard | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | KIM Zac | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | LIN Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 45 | RVACHEV Michael | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 47 | KAPLAN Maddox | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | EVANS Joseph | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 49 | LYCHKO Maksym | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% | |
| 50 | SOLARZ Arthur | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 51 | LEE Wyatt | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 52 | AGUIRRE Pablo | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | FRANCISCO Osvaldo | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | |
| 54 | CHANG Ian | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 55 | MILINKOVIC Maksim | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | HELMY Richard | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
| 57 | ZHAI Junqi | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 58 | LEE Kalvin | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | LI Ryan | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 60 | GUNNA Vishwaksai | 21% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | WENG ZOE | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | NILSEN Mark | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 63 | YU David | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | CHEN Luowen | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 65 | MORSS Dashiell | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | NUSCHKE Luka | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 67 | AU Joshua | 61% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 68 | CUELLAR Markus | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | LEE Henry | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 70 | SCHAUER Oliver | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 71 | LIN Junyi | 3% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 72 | LAW Oliver | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | NUSCHKE Conrad | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 74 | GU Eric | 15% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 74 | ALABI Azryl | 4% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 76 | VARHAUL Michael | 2% | 12% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 77 | ZHANG Ethan | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 78 | URBAN Leo | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.