Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOGERT James BRETT (Brett) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 2 | FEINBERG Gabriel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 3 | ISAAC Joseph (Izzy) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 42% | 12% |
| 5 | MILLER Finn S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 17% |
| 6 | PLUMER Jack E. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 7 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 8 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 10 | CORBAN Michael Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 15% |
| 11 | WALTHER Bryan M. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 12 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
| 13 | PANTEL Adam S. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 46% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 14 | HIRSCHMAN Burton E. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | LEIGH David A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% | |
| 16 | DAVIS Matthew D. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 19 | XU Zitong (Evan) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | BEDOR William J. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
| 22 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 23 | HERGERT Earl | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 24 | PAOLINI Nathan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 14% |
| 25 | KAMBESELES Jack M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 27 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 10% | |
| 29 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 31 | STOREY Joseph P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 32 | STUSNICK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% |
| 33 | KIM Juni C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% |
| 34 | VERMEULE Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% |
| 35 | INFINITO Christopher E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
| 36 | CHA Russell W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 23% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Derek D. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | LEE Timothy S. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 39 | SANCHEZ Lorenzo J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 41 | BAKER Kevin G. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 42 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 43 | HAO Jerry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | LI Jeffrey | 100% | 89% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | NEALE James H. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 47 | HUANG Forest | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | PARK Minchan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 49 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | STOTT Donovan R. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 52 | GONZALEZ Michael | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | YOSHIDA Stephen R. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | RYAN Joshua P. | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
| 57 | PHO Eric | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 58 | MOGILEVICH Michael | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | LUO Aaron | 100% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | CHARRON Jack H. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | LIU Frank | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | CARVALHO Daniel S. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 64 | BARREIRO Darren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 65 | CHEUNG Liyan | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | WHITEHURST JJ | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | AHN Sung-ho | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 67 | CONNELL Jay | 100% | 95% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 69 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.