Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARKER Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
2 | ROBINSON Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% |
3 | NAEMI Barsam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 30% |
3 | KIM DOHA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
5 | KIM Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
6 | PARKE Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% |
7 | WU Johnny y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% |
8 | LOISEAU Oscar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% |
9 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
9 | TAI Edison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
11 | HERNDON Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
12 | LEE Royce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
13 | LIU Zicheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
14 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
15 | GADHVI Darius | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 7% | - |
16 | REICHMANN Theo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
17 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
18 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
19 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
20 | KOFMAN David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
21 | WU Steven | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
22 | HSU Joshua | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 12% |
23 | FEI Victor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% |
24 | KIM Remington | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
25 | AVETISIAN Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
26 | MOU Jaydon | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
27 | WANG Jiacheng | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 10% | |
28 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% |
29 | QIAO James | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
30 | TANG Zheng | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 4% |
31 | MA Ciel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | - |
32 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
33 | TANG Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
34 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 11% |
35 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
35 | HWANG JEWOO | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 43% |
37 | DENG Destin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
38 | LEWIS Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
39 | VERON Darius | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 6% |
40 | MENG Haoyi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
41 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
42 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
43 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
44 | LOUIE Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
45 | CHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
46 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% |
47 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
48 | GUO Woody | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 4% |
49 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 33% | 6% |
50 | MA Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
51 | CHEN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% |
52 | JAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
53 | ZHANG Luqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
54 | BAUMAN Colin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
55 | LU Ian | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
56 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 33% | |
57 | WANG aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
58 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
59 | BROWN Korbyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 2% |
60 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
61 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
62 | LEE Damien | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
63 | KURUGANTI Vivaan | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
64 | WANG Juehan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
65 | LEUNG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
66 | HARRIS Hayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
66 | HAMILTON Travis | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
66 | ZHANG Austin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
69 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
70 | HERBRANDSON Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 9% |
71 | DEVINENI Avyang | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
72 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
73 | LI Timothy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
74 | RAHMAN Ali | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
75 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
76 | LEE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 1% |
76 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
78 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 97% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
79 | GUO Luke | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
80 | WANG Kyle | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
81 | RAHMAN Zayd | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
81 | DILEEP Roshan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
83 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
84 | LEE Damon | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
85 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
86 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 1% |
87 | LI Grayson | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
88 | FU Adrian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
89 | BALUCAN Caelus | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
89 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
91 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 97% | 73% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
92 | KLINKNER Charlie | 100% | 96% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
93 | YUE Bryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 4% | - |
94 | YAKOVYSHENKO Michael Alec | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
94 | MARTIN zachary | 100% | 97% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
96 | XIE HanZhang (Elon) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
97 | LIU Max | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
98 | WONG Vansen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
99 | LIN Bryan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
100 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
101 | KIM Evan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
102 | KROTZ Nicolas | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
103 | YU Brandon | 100% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
104 | WU MiEr | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
104 | REYES Landon | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
106 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
107 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
108 | MAXU Tiger | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
108 | SOLOMON Aryeh | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
110 | OR Anson | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
111 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
112 | ZHANG Sean | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
113 | HUR Tyson | 100% | 87% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
114 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
114 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | 100% | 88% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
116 | CHEN Linus | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
117 | DING Max | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
118 | SCHIPPER Johann | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
119 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
120 | WLOKA Erik | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
121 | LEE Leo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
122 | KOU Mason | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - |
123 | LIU Yihong | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
124 | MYRAH Devin | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
125 | BAI Alex | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
126 | RAU Shogun | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
127 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
128 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 84% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
129 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
130 | NICZEWICZ Charles | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
131 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 98% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
132 | DESHPANDE Arihant | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
133 | SHARMA Rohil | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
134 | NG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% | - |
135 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
136 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
137 | VELTKAMP Pablo | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
138 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
139 | CHEN Christopher | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
140 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 99% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
141 | SONG Jonathan | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
142 | YOO Minwoo | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
143 | LO Stefan | 100% | 82% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
144 | PARK Sihoon | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
145 | TAMHANE Sidhant | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
146 | LI Connor | 100% | 94% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
147 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
148 | ZHU Owen | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
149 | VYAS Arjun | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
149 | TALATAM Arnav | 100% | 77% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
151 | WU James | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - |
152 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
152 | HUANG EVAN | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
154 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
155 | BUENAVENTURA Camden | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
156 | JU Shang | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
157 | MA kevin | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
157 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
159 | MEHROTRA Darsh | 100% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
160 | SISODIA Shauryaditya | 100% | 28% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.