Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 48% |
2 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 55% | 19% |
3 | HICKS Zachary | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
3 | TIEN Jabin | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 35% | 7% | |
5 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
6 | PARKER Isaiah | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
7 | CHIEN Brandon | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
8 | CHOI Zachary | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 34% | 8% | |
9 | DIEDERICHS Jimmy G. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
10 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
11 | LI Yunji (Rain) | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
12 | JAIN Samyak | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
13 | LIU Noah | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
14 | DEMPSEY Connor | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
15 | CHAUDHURI Kabir | 8% | 36% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
16 | MA Victor | - | < 1% | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
17 | CHEN Bailey | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
18 | CHANDLER Paul F. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
19 | SHIRLEY Kai | - | 2% | 17% | 45% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
20 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
21 | WANG Terry | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
22 | CHAKRAVARTHY Arjun | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | DANIELS Jonah | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
24 | HABIB Farooq | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
24 | YUEN Nathan | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
26 | LIU Andrew | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
27 | SOULAIRE Tom | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 45% | 25% |
28 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
29 | GINZBURG Adam | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 4% | |
30 | GUIRAUDET Alistair | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
31 | TANG Mingyuan | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% | - |
32 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
33 | DOWDELL Riley | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
34 | HEINS Dylan | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
35 | SNIDER Jeffrey H. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
36 | HILLSTROM Nathan | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 30% | 5% | - |
37 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 40% | 7% |
38 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% | |
39 | NICHOLSON Dominic A. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 39% | 37% | 11% |
40 | NAIK Saininad | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
41 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 35% | 61% |
42 | WONG Baron | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
43 | SEO Shawn | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
44 | MCMANUS Farran | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
45 | AU Marcus J. | - | - | - | 7% | 29% | 44% | 20% |
46 | SCHROEDER Dylan | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 41% | 15% | |
47 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
48 | KUO Rylan | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
49 | ANDERSON Kai | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
50 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
51 | PAINTER Noah | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
52 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 6% |
53 | WAI Andreas | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
54 | SCHINDLER Sergey M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
55 | RUFANOV Maxim | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
56 | KOUTSOUKOS James | 2% | 20% | 50% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
57 | MILEY Walker | 2% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
58 | SINHA Zaan | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
59 | MIAO KUNQI | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
60 | LIU Yikun | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
61 | SIM Ian | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
62 | LAURIMAA Emil | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
63 | NGUYEN Peyton | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
64 | CHEW Aedan | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
65 | YOUNG Quentin | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
66 | WONG Ethan | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
67 | LAI Alexander | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
68 | ZHUANG William | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
69 | STAFFORD Bryan | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
70 | GOROZA Eric | 20% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
71 | ALLEGRETTI Zachary T. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
72 | PERALTA Christian | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
73 | WONG Preston | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
74 | XU Yanwen | 3% | 15% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
75 | AGGELER Donovan | 1% | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
76 | JU Hanul | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
77 | ZGAMA Oleksii | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
78 | PHILIPPINE Johan L. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% |
79 | MARTIN zachary | 52% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
80 | CHENG Trevor | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
81 | ROBERTS Peter | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 36% | 9% | |
82 | SIRBU Dan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
83 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
84 | ELZAYN Hadi S. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
85 | WANG Kunqi | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
86 | KLINKNER Richard | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
87 | URCIOLI Phenix | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | 1% | - |
88 | LIU Yichen | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
89 | DEVINENI Avyang | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
90 | MEHROTRA Dhruv | 39% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
91 | TOPPING Axel | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
92 | REED David | 23% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
93 | TUMULA Arihaan | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
94 | SHEN Jiayi | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | - |
95 | BUERGISSER Kai | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
96 | MCLAREN Mason | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
97 | BECK Brian C. | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
98 | MITCHEM Paolo | 34% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
99 | MOLLINIER Angel | 9% | 39% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.