Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | KENYON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 46% | |
| 3 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | 5% |
| 3 | WOLFE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 1% |
| 6 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
| 7 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
| 8 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 5% | - |
| 9 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | TIKHONOV Iliya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% |
| 11 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 14% |
| 12 | DICKENS Robert W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 35% | |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 91% | 52% | 9% | - | |
| 14 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 9% |
| 15 | SNYDER IV William B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 16 | SWICK Kerry J. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 17 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SEIKEL Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 19 | COFFEY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
| 20 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 21 | MEGGERS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 22 | IHRIE Greg H. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 97% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HELMINTOLLER Christian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | WU Shaochi | 100% | 99% | 74% | 25% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | CHAWLA Aarav | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% | 1% |
| 28 | WALKER Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
| 29 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 95% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | KENYON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
| 31 | MARSH Alex | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LIN Haley | 100% | 99% | 58% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | MERIWETHER Anne | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | HALE Bradley | 100% | 58% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 35 | TAN Theodore | 100% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 36 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 64% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 37 | SAVAGE Austin | 100% | 99% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | THIBAULT Azzy | 100% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 39 | FONS Amandine | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | ECKENROAD Hannah | 100% | 37% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | CHEN Shanshan | 100% | 6% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.