Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | WU Wallace | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | HUYNH Matthew | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | GRIGORIEV Michael | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
3 | SIU Max | D V V V V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
5 | CHANG Parker | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | KIM Daniel | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
7 | KIAYIAS Alexander | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
8 | KINGSLEY Griffin | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
9 | ROPER Griffin | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
10 | XIAN Kevin | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
11 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V V V | V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
12 | CAO Joshua | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
13 | KIAYIAS Anthony | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
14 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | V D V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
15 | WANG Ancen | V V V V D | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
16 | SONG Enoch | D V D D V | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
17 | CZARNECKI Thomas | V V V V D V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
18 | ULYSSE Jacob | V V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
19 | FREL Vincent | D V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
20 | HU Michael | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
21 | YANG Luca | D V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
22 | CHOI Hunter | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
23 | ZHAO David | V D V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
24 | LIU Yilin | V D V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
25 | LIN Ziyue | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | LU Hansen | V V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
27 | LIU Jeremy | D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | GUGALA Frank | V D D D V V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
29 | TARCHICHI Daniel | D D V D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | ZHONG Kingsley | V D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
31 | CAO Aaron | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
32 | ZHAI Alex | D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
33 | HUANG Marcus | V V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
34 | LIN Joshua | V V V D V D | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
35 | HUYNH Kaleb | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
36 | SPERBER Miles | D D V V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
37 | HUANG Dalynn | D D D V V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
38 | GOLI Arush | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
39 | GOLDSTEIN Tate | D V V D V D | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
40 | SHEN Lucas | D V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
40 | MOON Nolan | D V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
42 | DAVIDSON Henry | V D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
43 | SHAW eric | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
44 | LEONG Michael | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
45 | CASCONE Raffaele | V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
46 | KEEGAN Cole | D D V D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
47 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Alexander | D D D V D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
48 | BHOSREKAR Som | D V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
49 | JUVVADI Pratham | V V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
50 | CHEN Kevin | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
51 | MOORE Quinn | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
52 | CHONG Cooper | V D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
53 | MONDESIR Chace | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
54 | ZHANG Eric | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
55 | DAVE Neil | V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
56 | SPEZAKIS Achilles | D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
57 | HONG Thomas | D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
57 | SHARMA Ari | V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
59 | TIAN Dylan | V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
60 | MCCORMICK Chase | D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
61 | FOMIN Dash | D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
62 | JIANG Ethan | D D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
63 | SHINDE Aksh | D D D D V D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
64 | TIAN Andy | D V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
65 | LEVKOVICH Avery | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
66 | LIN Ethan | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
67 | VAN DER HARTEN Lukas | D D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
68 | FANG Lionel | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
69 | HUNTER khelile | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
70 | GENG Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
71 | SALEH yassin | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
72 | NAYAK Saideep | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
73 | ZHANG Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.