Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | NORMILE Nicholas | V V D V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
2 | LIU Adam | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
3 | LEE Aiden | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
5 | CHEN Brian | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
6 | DOUBOV Andrew | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
7 | MIDYANY Evan | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
8 | KIM Henry | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
9 | MAO Benjamin | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
10 | BOUDREAUX James | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
11 | DODIN Daniel M. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
12 | ANAFI Ari | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
13 | AHMED Mohsen | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
14 | LYCHKO Maksym | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
15 | RIM Eugene | V V V V D D | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
16 | RVACHEV Michael | D V D D D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
17 | XIE Brandon | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
18 | GLUSHKOV David | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
19 | LEE Aiden | D V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
20 | LI Ray | V V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
21 | MALHAM Andrew | V V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
22 | TRAN Spencer | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
23 | YANG Gary | V D V V D V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
24 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | D D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
25 | YI Nathan | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
26 | LI Jade | D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | D V D V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
28 | KIM Remington | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
29 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | V D V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
30 | YANG Alex | D D D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
31 | CHEN Edward | D D D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
32 | ZHU Yiming | D D D V D | V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
33 | SONG Changze | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
34 | SINGLETON Aman | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
35 | LEE DoWon | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
36 | CAMP Ethan | V V V V V D | D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
37 | ZENG Andrew | D V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
37 | WANG-SONG Evan | D V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
39 | CUMMINGS Owen | V V V V D | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
40 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | V V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
41 | KABA Elias | V D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
42 | LEE Anton | D V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
43 | WANG Jason | V D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
44 | KAPLAN Maddox | V D V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
45 | WANG Marcus | V V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
46 | CHEN Jayden | D V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
47 | WANG Charles | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
48 | SUN Lucas | D V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
49 | HELMY Richard | V D V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
50 | HAN Keyi | V V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
51 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | D V V V D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
52 | ACAR Devin | V D V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
53 | TESFAYE Elias | V D V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
53 | KIM Zac | V D D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
55 | ZHAO Pierce | D V D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
56 | NG Nico | D D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
57 | OCONNOR Paul | V D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
58 | CUELLAR Markus | D V D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
59 | LUO Alexander | D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
60 | KIM Gene | V D D D D V | V D | 4.3 | 2 | -2.3 |
61 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | D D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
62 | HENNESSY Levon | V D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
63 | KROPP Wesley | D V D D D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
64 | ZHANG Marcus | D D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
65 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | V D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
66 | ROSIELLO Francesco | D V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
67 | GU Eric | V V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
68 | LI Ryan | D V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
69 | LEE Henry | D V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | NOOL Alexander | D D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
71 | SONG Ryan | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
72 | MARIN Ayan N. | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
72 | ZHANG Austin | D V D D D V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
74 | TSIEN Richard | D V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
75 | TSANG Aiden | D V D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
76 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | D D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
77 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | D V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
78 | STAUDINGER Enzo | V D D V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
79 | LEE Daniel | V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
80 | AU Joshua | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
81 | YAO Tristan | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
82 | FOGEL Jake | D D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
83 | MAXWELL Sheito | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
84 | ZHANG Jonathan | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
85 | KIM Samuel | D D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
86 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
87 | YU David | D D V D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
88 | CAFASSO Alexander | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
89 | FENG Xinmin | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
89 | PENG Ethan | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
91 | ZHANG Shuhao | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
92 | BANG Dylan | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
93 | LIN ZIJIE | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
94 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
94 | SI Anderson | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
96 | LEE Kalvin | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.