Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | LIU Adam | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
| 3 | VYSOTSKIY Evan | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 5 | CHEN Brian | - | - | - | - | 3% | 22% | 75% |
| 6 | DOUBOV Andrew | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% |
| 7 | MIDYANY Evan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 8 | KIM Henry | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 9 | MAO Benjamin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
| 10 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 42% |
| 11 | DODIN Daniel M. | - | 2% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 12 | ANAFI Ari | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 13 | AHMED Mohsen | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 14 | LYCHKO Maksym | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
| 15 | RIM Eugene | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | RVACHEV Michael | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | XIE Brandon | - | - | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 18 | GLUSHKOV David | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | LEE Aiden | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 20 | LI Ray | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 21 | MALHAM Andrew | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 22 | TRAN Spencer | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 23 | YANG Gary | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 24 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | YI Nathan | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 41% | 6% |
| 26 | LI Jade | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 27 | RATUSHNYI Georgii | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 28 | KIM Remington | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | 1% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 30 | YANG Alex | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | CHEN Edward | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 32 | ZHU Yiming | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | SONG Changze | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 34 | SINGLETON Aman | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 35 | LEE DoWon | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 36 | CAMP Ethan | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 37 | ZENG Andrew | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 37 | WANG-SONG Evan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | CUMMINGS Owen | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 41 | KABA Elias | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | LEE Anton | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 43 | WANG Jason | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | KAPLAN Maddox | 14% | 34% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 45 | WANG Marcus | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | CHEN Jayden | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 47 | WANG Charles | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 48 | SUN Lucas | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 49 | HELMY Richard | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 50 | HAN Keyi | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 51 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 52 | ACAR Devin | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 53 | TESFAYE Elias | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 53 | KIM Zac | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | ZHAO Pierce | - | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 56 | NG Nico | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 57 | OCONNOR Paul | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | CUELLAR Markus | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | LUO Alexander | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 60 | KIM Gene | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 61 | SUBRAMANIAM Sahil | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 62 | HENNESSY Levon | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 63 | KROPP Wesley | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 64 | ZHANG Marcus | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ORESKOVIC Olivier | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 66 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | GU Eric | 20% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | LI Ryan | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 69 | LEE Henry | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 70 | NOOL Alexander | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 71 | SONG Ryan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | MARIN Ayan N. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 72 | ZHANG Austin | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 74 | TSIEN Richard | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 75 | TSANG Aiden | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 76 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 77 | SHTEYNBLIK Michael | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 78 | STAUDINGER Enzo | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 79 | LEE Daniel | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 80 | AU Joshua | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | YAO Tristan | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | FOGEL Jake | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | MAXWELL Sheito | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 84 | ZHANG Jonathan | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 85 | KIM Samuel | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | LEVESQUE Gabriel | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 87 | YU David | 11% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | CAFASSO Alexander | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 89 | FENG Xinmin | 37% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 89 | PENG Ethan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 91 | ZHANG Shuhao | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 92 | BANG Dylan | 27% | 44% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 93 | LIN ZIJIE | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 94 | GIMBRERE Alexandre | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | SI Anderson | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 96 | LEE Kalvin | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.