Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
2 | CHEN Hanson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
3 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
3 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
5 | LU Andy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
6 | BORKOWSKI Olgierd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
7 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
8 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% |
9 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% |
10 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
11 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% |
12 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% |
13 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
14 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 4% |
15 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
16 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 22% | |
17 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | 6% |
17 | CHA James | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
19 | WANG Rory | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
20 | CHO Jadon Yushin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 51% | |
21 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% |
22 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% |
23 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% |
24 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
25 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 9% | |
26 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
27 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
28 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% |
29 | BELOKON Sammy | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 4% | |
30 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 22% | |
31 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
32 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
33 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 91% | 51% | 13% | 1% | |
34 | FANG Haoyu | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% | |
35 | ZHENG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | 5% | |
36 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | TEH Tang-Ngu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
38 | ZHANG Hanru | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
39 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
40 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
41 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
42 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
43 | JIN Daniel | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
44 | JIN Andy | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% | 1% | |
45 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | 2% |
46 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
47 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
48 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
50 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - |
51 | GRUNENWALD Henri | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
52 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
53 | PLUMMER Waylon | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
53 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 6% | - |
55 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 2% | - | |
56 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 20% | |
57 | BAI Austin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | |
58 | KUO Phineas | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | |
59 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - |
60 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
61 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
62 | QU Richard | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
64 | LEE Junehyuk | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
65 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
66 | KAYE Ben | 100% | 80% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
67 | HUANG Nathan | 100% | 81% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | |
68 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
69 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
70 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
71 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
72 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 85% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
73 | KAGAN Noah | 100% | 88% | 36% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
74 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
75 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 88% | 29% | 4% | - | - | |
76 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
77 | POLEPALLI Vinil | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
78 | LEONG Samuel | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
79 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
80 | CHINN Callum | 100% | 93% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
81 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
82 | CHOW Kingsley | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
83 | FALCONE Jack | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
84 | GATES Combustion | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
85 | COUAILLIER Leo | 100% | 72% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
85 | YOUM Tyson | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
87 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 77% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
88 | WANG Luke | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
88 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
90 | PERKINS Nathaniel | 100% | 25% | 1% | - | - | - | |
91 | HU Daniel | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
91 | NAM Justin | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
93 | ZHANG Ethan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
94 | FRIEDMAN Marcus | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.