Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 2 | CHAVAN Arya | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 3 | MUND Ruth | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 5 | UEMOTO Lynn | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 6 | SHMULER Fiona | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 7 | CHOI Charlotte | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 8 | LI Alexis | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 41% | 28% | |
| 9 | GUGALA Hanna | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 10 | LI Sonia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 11 | MACKAY Katherine | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% | |
| 12 | FUNG Iris | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 13 | PROBASCO Leila | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 14 | GENTILE Vittoria | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 4% |
| 15 | NANDA Maanika | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 16 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 17 | CROOKS Riley | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 18 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 19 | STADNIK Emilia | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 20 | NG Sophia | - | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 21 | KNOBEL Sophia | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
| 22 | FREEMAN Armine | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 23 | MYAT Chloe | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 24 | NEUMAN Ella | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 25 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 26 | NAYAK Esha | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% |
| 27 | BOLT - TURNER Carmen | 1% | 9% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 28 | BUTMAN Chloe Alexandra | 1% | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 29 | KIM Audrey | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 30 | INSINGA Ava | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | ZONG Eliane | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | LAFFY Lily | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 33 | HUANG Pierra | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 34 | YANNOPOULOS Pompie | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 35 | PARK Haylie | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | KHOST Maeve | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | RANJAN Diya | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 38 | MURPHY Jessica | - | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | LIU Chelsea | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 40 | PASUPULETI Laya | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 41 | VATS Ishita | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 42 | BARNES Sarah | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | HO Sophia | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | BAINS Nandini | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 45 | SIROIS Neve | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHI Claire | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 47 | VISWANATHAN Nishka | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 48 | GUVEN Coco | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% | |
| 49 | WONG Charlene | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 50 | LIANG Claire | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 51 | HUANG Zoe | 16% | 47% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | SHELLEY Scarlett | - | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 53 | LOURENCO Alexandra | - | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 54 | KWON Ava | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | GALLAGHER Isabella | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 56 | NARAYANAN Sinduja | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | YERENKOVA Ameliia | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 58 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | ROHATGI Saanvi | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 60 | CHEN Ziyi | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 61 | LEE Kaitlin | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 62 | MANGAT Alexis | 90% | 9% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | QURESHI Fizzah | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 64 | CALDERON Isabella | 81% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.