Fencers Club Inc. - New York, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHUMACHER Cooper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | |
| 2 | LIOU Solomon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 3 | LAWSON Henry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
| 3 | HENSAL Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 42% | 7% | |
| 5 | SANDERS Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% |
| 6 | LAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | |
| 7 | MANN Jake | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 6% | |
| 8 | GRIFFITHS Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | |
| 9 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
| 11 | HILBERT Xavier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | |
| 12 | KAULL James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | |
| 13 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 14 | CHEIAN Dinis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 5% |
| 15 | SERAFIN Ben | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 21% | 1% | |
| 16 | GAO Daniel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 6% | |
| 17 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
| 18 | HILBERT Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 7% |
| 19 | KOKENGE Reid | 100% | 100% | 99% | 79% | 34% | 4% | |
| 20 | STEVENS Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 9% |
| 21 | REPIC Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 22 | SETO Jing | 100% | 95% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | MAO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 47% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | GANA Jorge | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 18% | |
| 25 | SHIFRON Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 33% | |
| 26 | OGBORN Teddy | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 27 | MISHIMA Torata | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
| 28 | CHEN YiHeng | 100% | 89% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 19% | 2% | - |
| 30 | WONG Maximus | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | KOEPPEL Levi | 100% | 94% | 67% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | CHEN Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | FULLER George | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 35 | GAO "George" Xiaojiang | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 89% | 54% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 38 | CHOI Joong Kyung | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 28% | 2% | |
| 39 | CLARE James | 100% | 84% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | FERRAIOLO James | 100% | 83% | 43% | 10% | - | - | |
| 41 | MILLER Owen | 100% | 82% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | IYER Ganapathi | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | LIU Fengqi | 100% | 55% | 7% | - | - | - | |
| 45 | BLAKESLEE Ian | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 46 | BLAKESLEE Garrett | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 48 | NESTERCZUK Maddox | 100% | 72% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 49 | TABLEMAN Doug | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | 4% | |
| 50 | MILLER Luke | 100% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | CHOI Paul | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 26% | 2% | |
| 51 | FEAGIN Patrick | 100% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HU Robert | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 54 | NILSEN Mark | 100% | 62% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 60% | 8% | - | - | - | |
| 56 | FRIEDMAN Andres | 100% | 60% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | LIN Nathan | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHU Steve | 100% | 38% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 59 | SCHIAVONE Oreste | 100% | 45% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | TANG Jeremy | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.