Fredericksburg, VA - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHEN Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
2 | LUTAR Lucas N. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
5 | CHEN Allen | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
6 | ARIZA Isaac A. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
7 | LEE Joshua | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
8 | GISLER Benjamin B. | V D D V D D | V V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
9 | TIAN Aaron C. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 6 | +2.3 |
10 | PAULSON Connor M. | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
11 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
12 | DOUGLAS Oscar M. | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
13 | HUTH Mitchell | V D D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
14 | NAGER Noah | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
15 | TAHOUN Mostafa | V V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
16 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
17 | GOOR Julian | V V D V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
18 | KEE Andrew L. | V D V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
19 | YANG Luao | V D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
20 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
21 | KOBAL Maximilian | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
22 | LEE Aidan | V V V D V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
23 | SICHITIU Alexander | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | D V V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
25 | ZHANG Yun Isaac | D V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
26 | ANTON Nathaniel | D V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
27 | MARX Oscar L. | V V D V D D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
28 | WALTER Evran M. | V D V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
29 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | D D V D V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
30 | HUGHES Evan J. | D D V D V | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
31 | ROUNTREE Rob | D D V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
32 | GAO William | D D D V D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
33 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | D D V V V V | D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
34 | GORBACHEV Alexander | V V D D V D | D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
35 | MOHAMED Murad | V D V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
36 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V D V V D D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
37 | QIU Daniel | V D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
38 | MOHAMED Amir | V D V D D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
39 | BUERGIN Aidan | D V D D V D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
40 | KNOEPFFLER Alex | D D D V V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
41 | LIU Eric Y. | D D D D V V | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
42 | RINEHART Conner M. | D V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
43 | PAI Lakshan K. | D D V D D V | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 | |
44 | KNIZHNIK David | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
45 | LONG Connor M. | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
46 | LOVE Aaron | D V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
47 | SAGE Michael J. | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
48 | REEVES Liam | D V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
49 | DRESSEL Jet | D V D D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
50 | JI Aidan Y. | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
51 | FOTENOS Noah T. | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
52 | YU Jonathan J. | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
53 | WANG Jeremy | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
54 | SELLERY Robert M. | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
55 | ROBBINS Tusker F. | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.