Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PARK Avan | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 2 | TAN benjamin | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | SUN Roy | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | LIN Sampson | V V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 6 | +2.4 |
| 5 | EVANS Desmond | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 6 | TURBAT Travis | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 7 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
| 8 | LIU Zichen | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 9 | MENG Andy | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 10 | SUN Lucas | D V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | NGUYEN Norris | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 12 | CHONG Tanner | V D V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 13 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | D V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 14 | WANG Eason | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | CAO Benjamin | D V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | GU Evan | V D D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | ZHANG William | V V D V V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 18 | MENG Eric | D D V V V V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 19 | BAGWELL Theodore | V V V V D D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 20 | YIN Luke | V V V V D D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 21 | XU Daniel | V D V D V D | D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 22 | ZHANG alex | D V V D D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 23 | ZHANG Benjamin | V V V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 24 | CHANG Owen | V V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 25 | TROYANKER Makar | D V D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 26 | DONG YIKUN | D D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | RAMZAN Haaris | D V V D D D | V D | 5.7 | 2 | -3.7 |
| 28 | PHILLIPS Julian | V D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | NGO Lincoln | V D D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 30 | THIMIRI Trishaan | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 31 | CHEN Liam Alexander | D D D D D V | V D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
| 32 | CHEN Ian | D D D D D D | V D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 33 | LIN Evan | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | RUDENKO Zhdan | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 35 | ANDERSON Stellan | D D D V D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 36 | WANG Eavan | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | LEE Elliot | D V D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 38 | NEWMAN August | D D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 39 | LACE Kal | D D D D D D | D | 4.5 | 0 | -4.5 |
| 40 | WU William | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 40 | MALAKAN Noah | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 42 | KHANDAN MILAN | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.