Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Avan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 17% |
| 2 | TAN benjamin | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 3 | SUN Roy | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | LIN Sampson | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 5 | EVANS Desmond | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 74% | 1% |
| 6 | TURBAT Travis | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 24% |
| 7 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 8 | LIU Zichen | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 9 | MENG Andy | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | SUN Lucas | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 11 | NGUYEN Norris | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 12 | CHONG Tanner | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 13 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | WANG Eason | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
| 15 | CAO Benjamin | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
| 16 | GU Evan | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 17 | ZHANG William | - | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 47% | 16% |
| 18 | MENG Eric | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 19 | BAGWELL Theodore | 6% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 20 | YIN Luke | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | - |
| 21 | XU Daniel | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% |
| 22 | ZHANG alex | 1% | 9% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ZHANG Benjamin | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | CHANG Owen | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 25 | TROYANKER Makar | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 26 | DONG YIKUN | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | RAMZAN Haaris | - | - | < 1% | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 28 | PHILLIPS Julian | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | NGO Lincoln | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | THIMIRI Trishaan | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Liam Alexander | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 32 | CHEN Ian | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LIN Evan | 6% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | RUDENKO Zhdan | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ANDERSON Stellan | 40% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 36 | WANG Eavan | 10% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | LEE Elliot | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | NEWMAN August | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | LACE Kal | < 1% | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% |
| 40 | WU William | 22% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | MALAKAN Noah | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | KHANDAN MILAN | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.