Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LICHTENFELD Naomi | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
| 2 | YIP Allison | V D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | KOU Cynthia | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | FU Shannon | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.7 | 5 | -0.7 |
| 5 | KIM Vivian | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 6 | FLYNN Kensington | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 7 | LIAO irene | V D D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 8 | MIAO Anthea | D V D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 9 | CHO Jacey | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | VOO Evelyn | V V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 11 | SUN Joanna | V D V D V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | YOON Claire | V V D V D V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 13 | LYNTON Olivia | V V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 14 | WANG Phoebe | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 15 | LI Wan-Tao | V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 16 | PARKE Jaime | D D D D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 17 | DEKERMANJI kate | V V V V V V | D | 3.5 | 6 | +2.5 |
| 18 | LI Carlie | D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 19 | YANG Nina | V V D V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 20 | KWAK Olivia | D D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | SINGLETARY Iona | D D V V V V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 22 | ARNOLD Evangeline | V V V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | POON Eleni | D V V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 24 | LU Chu | V V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | AGARWAL Keya | V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 26 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | D V D D V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | DEJOY Leilah | D D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 28 | SCHWARTZMAN Avital | V D D D D V | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
| 29 | WANG Su | D V D V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 30 | MA Sloane | D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 31 | LYNTON Alexandra | D D V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | ZHU Anna | D D V D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | MANDAP Natalya | V D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 34 | GROTH Lillian | D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 35 | MILLER Grey | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | LEE Layla | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | KEDAN Carmella | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | WU Angela | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 39 | CHAI Serena | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 40 | KHOURI Sara | D D D D D D | D | 4.0 | 0 | -4.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.