Intercontinental - Los Angeles Hotel - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LICHTENFELD Naomi | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 2 | YIP Allison | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 3 | KOU Cynthia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
| 3 | FU Shannon | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
| 5 | KIM Vivian | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 40% | 34% |
| 6 | FLYNN Kensington | 1% | 8% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | LIAO irene | - | - | 5% | 27% | 46% | 23% | |
| 8 | MIAO Anthea | 3% | 13% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 9 | CHO Jacey | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 10 | VOO Evelyn | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 11 | SUN Joanna | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | YOON Claire | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 13 | LYNTON Olivia | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 14 | WANG Phoebe | 1% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | LI Wan-Tao | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 16 | PARKE Jaime | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 17 | DEKERMANJI kate | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | LI Carlie | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
| 19 | YANG Nina | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | KWAK Olivia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | SINGLETARY Iona | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 22 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 23 | POON Eleni | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 24 | LU Chu | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 25 | AGARWAL Keya | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 26 | KUSHNERENKO Maiia | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | DEJOY Leilah | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 28 | SCHWARTZMAN Avital | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 29 | WANG Su | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | MA Sloane | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | LYNTON Alexandra | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 32 | ZHU Anna | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MANDAP Natalya | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 34 | GROTH Lillian | 48% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 35 | MILLER Grey | 3% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LEE Layla | 23% | 44% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | KEDAN Carmella | 30% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | WU Angela | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | CHAI Serena | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 40 | KHOURI Sara | < 1% | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.