Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Ian C. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% | |
| 2 | WOLFE Alex | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 3 | SNYDER IV William B. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% |
| 3 | TIKHONOV Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 5 | SU Caleb | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 43% |
| 6 | SWENSON Keane J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% | |
| 7 | YI Nathan | - | 4% | 27% | 46% | 21% | 2% | |
| 8 | FOREST Sung | - | 2% | 19% | 44% | 30% | 4% | |
| 9 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 1% | |
| 10 | KENYON Jacob | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 11 | TIKHONOV Ilia | - | - | - | 3% | 38% | 47% | 12% |
| 12 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 13 | YU Jason | - | 3% | 31% | 44% | 20% | 2% | |
| 14 | GAMBINO Robert A. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 16 | WATSON Raymond | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 39% | 8% | |
| 17 | MARSH Alex | 3% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 18 | MEGGERS Davin | - | 1% | 20% | 45% | 29% | 5% | |
| 19 | HUGHES Michael D. | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 4% | |
| 20 | MEGGERS Samuel | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 21 | NISHIDOI Yusaku | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 4% |
| 22 | SIMS Martin L. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 33% | 9% | - | - |
| 23 | BERGMANN Beatrix | - | 9% | 39% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | HUTZ Michael B. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
| 25 | TIRRELL Justin J. | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 26 | SEIKEL Spencer | - | 3% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 6% | |
| 27 | COFFEY Jacob | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 28 | SAVAGE Austin | 30% | 49% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 29 | WOOLF Fredrika | 3% | 24% | 57% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | KENYON Benjamin | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 3% |
| 31 | MOORE Guy L. | 1% | 14% | 44% | 33% | 8% | - | |
| 32 | ARMSTRONG Gary | 3% | 25% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MURPHY Megan | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | MERIWETHER Anne | 10% | 54% | 32% | 4% | - | - | |
| 35 | LORENZ Nathan | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | FOOR Jonathan | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | LUKAS Alexander | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 38 | PERKINS Zoe | 11% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | HALE Bradley | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | TAN Theodore | 44% | 47% | 9% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | WHITTINGTON Kelly | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | NESTERUK Hope | 26% | 55% | 17% | 1% | - | - | |
| 42 | FAN Yonghua | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | PAWTAN Carly | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.