New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHENG Patrick Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 2 | MARCHANT Albert J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
| 3 | MOTIR Lucas D. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 3 | KUMAR Anitya | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 5 | MCDERMOTT Brian | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
| 6 | KRONROD Tal | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 7 | HERMANSON David B. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 8 | CRONIN Darragh J. | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 9 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 10 | LESPERANCE Lucas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 11 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 12 | BURNHAM Charlie E. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
| 13 | HE Lawrence | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | LEHR William D. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 15 | JIN Owen | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | WYATT Seth | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | WIEDERHORN ethan | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 18 | LIEF Isaac R. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | GLAZ Nicholas S. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 20 | SHAH Maximilian A. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 21 | ALFAIATE Lucas | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | DYER Ian E. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | HANRATTY Liam | 1% | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | HOWELL Thomas A. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 26 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 27 | SINGH Laekhram | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 28 | FENWICK Luke A. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 29 | LIU Jack | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 30 | MARICI Ryan | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | GROSSMAN August | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MARKHAM Jimmy | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 34 | LUKANYUK Lorence | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 35 | TROAKE Henry R. | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | LAI Coby | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 37 | SIMPSON Patrick | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | MAGDA Daniel | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 39 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 40 | MATEI Daniel | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 41 | COTAJ Andrew | 27% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | WU Joseph | - | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 38% | 12% |
| 44 | PAGE Duncan | 9% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 45 | FERREIRA Noah J. | 1% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 46 | PATENAUDE Kameron | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | BENINI Alexander J. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 48 | MORTON William | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | BAZURO Andrew | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CONNORS Jacob | 46% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | GIRARDI Brian | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 10% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | GRUMMER Ryan | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | ROWE Jason | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | HERBERT Harrison | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.