New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
| 2 | MIALL Steven A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | |
| 3 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
| 3 | LEE Jacob J | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 5 | CATINO Brennen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 6 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 7 | SEMAPAKDI-CHANG Kaiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | |
| 8 | GUO Justin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 9 | WANG Mason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 8% |
| 10 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% | |
| 11 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 12% |
| 12 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
| 13 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 14 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% | 3% |
| 15 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% | |
| 16 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 17 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 11% | |
| 18 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 19 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | - | |
| 20 | DECORLETO III Andrew (Tripp) J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 21 | JIA Jing Yu | 100% | 97% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 22 | XIAO Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 23 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 38% | 7% | |
| 24 | SIMA Congyu | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | CAO Ray | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 3% | |
| 26 | UNGERER Roger M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 27 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 28 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 29 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 30 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 31 | SIMON Luke | 100% | 97% | 72% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | WEI Qian | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | GERRISH William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 35 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | WANG Julang | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | LOGAN Kai | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% | |
| 38 | LU Jason | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | DALBERG Anders | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 41 | ZHANG Teddy | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CHUNG Ian | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | LIU Jeremiah | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | LEWIS Nikhil I. | 100% | 65% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 45 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
| 46 | PALLADINO Ben | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 47 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | ZHENG Harrison | 100% | 91% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | CHOI Eugene | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | YE Gavin | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHA James | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | SOLOPOULOS James | 100% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 54 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 55 | MARSHALL Henry | 100% | 93% | 54% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | BANG Ian | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | BANG Sian | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.