New Haven, CT - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEHR William D. | V V V V V D | V V V V V V | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 2 | LESPERANCE Lucas | D V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 3 | DYER Ian E. | V V D V D | V V V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 3 | HERMANSON David B. | D V V D V | V V V V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 5 | SOOMRO Adam A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 6 | JIN Owen | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 7 | LIEF Isaac R. | D V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | GOLDFINE Ian J. | V D D V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 9 | BELLIVEAU Raven C. | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | MCDERMOTT Brian | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 11 | SHAH Maximilian A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 12 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | LEE Noah | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 14 | RICHARD Owen | V D V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | EKE Frank | V V D V D D | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | PIERANUNZI IV Wills | V V D D D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 17 | GALLANT Antoine | V V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 18 | HE Lawrence | V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 19 | WU Joseph | V V V V V D | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 20 | JIN Alexander | D V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 21 | HA Daniel | V V V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 22 | MORTON William | D V V D V V | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 23 | BAZURO Andrew | D V V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 24 | SMEDLEY Drew N. | D D V V V V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 25 | DOTSON Gus | V V D V D | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 26 | MACARTY Jordan T. | D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | LANGTON Sawyer | D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | V D V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 29 | LAI Coby | D V D V V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 30 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 31 | SIMPSON Patrick | V D D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 32 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | V D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 33 | HANRATTY Liam | V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 34 | BORODITSKY Ethan | D V V V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 35 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | D V V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 36 | GROSSMAN August | V D D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 37 | PRIHODKO Max | D V V D D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | COTAJ Andrew | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 39 | STEVENS George | V D V D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 40 | PAHLAVI Kamran | V D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 41 | WIEDERHORN ethan | V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 42 | GAO Daniel | D V D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 43 | REINEKE Alexander | D D D D V | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 44 | BRUNNER Dylan J. | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 45 | MATEI Daniel | V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | ROLLO Emmett H. | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 47 | HERBERT Harrison | D D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | FERREIRA Noah J. | D D D D V D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 49 | CONNELLY Asa D. | D D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 50 | PAGE Duncan | D V D D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 51 | BARSEMIAN Alexander | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 52 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 53 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | D D V D D D | D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 54 | AMELOT Alexander | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 55 | ZHANG William | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 55 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 57 | STEWART Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 58 | CONNORS Jacob | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 59 | GIRARDI Brian | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.