MSA Sports Spot - Grand Rapids, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 2 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% | |
| 3 | KIM Sterling S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 9% | |
| 3 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 40% | |
| 5 | WANG William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 6 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | JUSCINSKI Michal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 8 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 9 | FANG Hanning | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% | |
| 10 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 98% | 83% | 54% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 11 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 9% |
| 12 | BARFORD Giovanni | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 13 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 14 | BAMPTON Nicholas J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 14% | |
| 15 | ZHANG James | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | LEHNER Brian | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
| 18 | UNG Kei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
| 19 | BROOKS Zach B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 40% | |
| 20 | MITTAL Sanil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 21 | SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 40% | 7% |
| 22 | PIENTA Chris J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 24 | BOSS Evan | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 25 | ROWLAND Marsden | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 26 | JANYSKA Allen | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 27 | XIAO Yichen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
| 28 | SNYDER Alex | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | GUTIERREZ-SARABIA Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 1% | |
| 30 | KOENIGSKNECHT Julian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
| 31 | RIECK Brennan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 32 | ALI Adam | 100% | 94% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | ZHENG Alan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 4% |
| 35 | LARSON Vaughn | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | LAPP J P | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LI Peizhen (Daniel) | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | CHU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 46% | |
| 39 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 40 | CASTELLI Marco | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 41 | ZHANG Michael | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 42 | TIMEK Jan | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 44 | TOWNSEND George | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 45 | PATEL Aayan | 100% | 87% | 43% | 8% | - | - | |
| 46 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 47 | RICHARDSON Ray | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 48 | SAYLOR Henry | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | OLIN Wesley | 100% | 94% | 64% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 50 | DEPAUW Achiel | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | SEABLOOM Jack | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 52 | JERDEE trevor | 100% | 94% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | TAHA Ray | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | JERDEE Colton | 100% | 69% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | TICHENOR Abreham | 100% | 55% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 97% | 64% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | STREETER Oliver | 100% | 76% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | AYAR Riley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 59 | VERWORN Jonathan | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.