Fairfax Challenge SYC/RJCC

Junior Men's Épée

Saturday, March 22, 2025 at 12:30 PM

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 BOUDREAUX James V V D V V V V V V V V V V 5.0 5 -
2 MODANLOU Navid D V D V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
3 LEE JoonWon V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
3 DAVIDENKO Alexander D V V V D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
5 MANN Jake R. V V V V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
6 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) D V D V V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
7 SINGLETON Aman V D D D V V V V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
8 ARMSTRONG TyLee V D V D D V V V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
9 XIE Brandon V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
10 YANG Gary V V V V D V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
11 MEHROTRA Neel V D V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
12 CHOI Kaiden I. V D V V V V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
13 ACAR Devin D V V V V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
14 MIDYANY Evan V V D D V V V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
15 HU Robert J. V V D D V V V D 3.2 2 -1.2
16 KONG Brandon D V D V D V V V D 2.3 2 -0.3
17 FISHMAN Rahm V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
18 LEE Aiden V V V V V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
19 CHEN Brian V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
20 RUSSELL James D V V V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
21 PETROW Zoryan V V V V V D V V D 4.1 5 +0.9
22 RIM Eugene V D V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
23 YI Nathan V V D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
24 TIKHONOV Daniel V V V V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
25 SINGH Ravin V V V D D V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
26 PENG Yue V D D V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
27 TIKHONOV Ilia V V D V D V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
28 ZAHRAN Aiden D D V V V V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
29 YU Jason V V V D D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
30 LIN Nathan D V V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
31 BERNARD Jack B. D V D V D V V V D 4.5 3 -1.5
32 PAL Ian K. V V D D D D V V D 3.4 2 -1.4
33 LI Jade V V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
34 HAN Sam D V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
34 EVANS George D V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
34 GUMEDELLI Mohnish V V V V V D V D 3.5 5 +1.5
37 SAUNIER Cameron D V V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
38 KIM Gene V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
39 SHOUSHA Yassin V V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
39 LEE DoWon D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
41 SHILOV Maxim D V V V V V V D 1.9 5 +3.1
42 ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas V D V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
43 SUN Lucas V V V D V V V D 2.5 5 +2.5
44 LIDSKY Phineas V V V V D V D 3.6 4 +0.4
45 YU Austin V V V D V V D 4.0 4 -
46 SINGH Aryaman V D V V V D V D 4.3 4 -0.3
47 YANG Alex V V V D D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
48 SHOUSHA Hamza D D V V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
49 DOUBOV Andrew D V D V V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
50 CHENH Justin V V D V D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
51 WONG King-Yee V V V D V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
52 CAFASSO Alexander V D V V D V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
53 ALEXANDER Jacksen D D V V V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
54 HELMY Richard V D V D V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
55 DONNELLY Enzo V V V D D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
56 RAPALSKI Thomas V D D V V D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
57 HULL Liam D D V V D V V D 3.5 3 -0.5
57 ZHANG Lucas V V V D D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
59 LIN Haley D D V V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
60 CHEN Jayden V V D D V D V D 3.8 3 -0.8
61 DAVIS Andrew V D D V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
62 WANG Clayton V V D D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
63 MCCABE Kian D D D V V V D 0.9 2 +1.1
64 HE Bronto D D V D D V V D 2.7 2 -0.7
65 FOGEL Jake V V D V D V D 1.1 4 +2.9
66 LEE Anton V V D V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
67 DELONG Joshua D V V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
67 LEE Benjamin D V D V D V D 2.8 3 +0.2
69 LEECH Braedan V D V V D D D 2.2 3 +0.8
70 LEE Henry D V V V D D D 2.0 3 +1.0
71 DILDA Griffin V D D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
72 ZHANG Austin D V D V V D D 2.0 3 +1.0
73 KIM Remington V V V D D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
74 BAI Brian V D D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
75 ADDYSON Aidan D D V V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
76 KE Sebastian D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
77 SUBRAMANIAM Sahil D D V V D D 1.8 2 +0.2
78 LORENZ Nathan V D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
79 ZHENG Jason D V D D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
80 ROBERTS Phoenix D D D V V D D 2.7 2 -0.7
81 MONTAGUE Braeden A. D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
82 TSIEN Richard D V D D V D D 2.0 2 -
83 CHEN YiHeng V D D D V D D 3.8 2 -1.8
84 CHEN Edward D D V D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
85 SMOTHERS Nathan D D D D V V D 1.1 2 +0.9
86 SUNKARA Vishnu D D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
87 CRESPO Nathaniel Justus D V D D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
88 DAN Rex D D D D V V D 3.7 2 -1.7
89 YU Samuel V D V D D D D 4.1 2 -2.1
90 BETTS Kieran V V D D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
91 GRIGORENKO Gleb E. V D V D D D D 1.7 2 +0.3
92 TUMULA Arihaan D V V D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
93 WANG Marcus V V D D D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
94 WATERS Nathaniel V D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
96 RAMEY Daylon D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
97 NILSEN Mark D D D V D D 1.5 1 -0.5
97 BANG Dylan D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
99 CHO Alex V D D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
100 CUELLAR Markus D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
101 SZIEDE Kieran D V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
102 AGGELER Donovan D D D V D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
103 KIM Jaden D D D V D D D 3.4 1 -2.4
104 JONES Gideon D D V D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
105 GUO Lucas V D D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
106 YU David D V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
107 MILLER Jordan D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
107 MAXWELL Sheito D D D V D D D 0.8 1 +0.2
109 URIA Sullivan D V D D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
110 FENG Xinmin D D D D V D D 0.7 1 +0.3
111 BROSNAN Solomon D D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
112 ELLIS, IV Floyd D D D D V D D 0.8 1 +0.2
113 ARZT Nicholas D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
114 THOMAS Ethan D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
115 JARRATT Isaac D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
116 GATEWOOD Michael D D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
117 BICKTA Joshua D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
118 STRAFFORD Andrew D D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
119 WU Jiachen D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
120 KOGAN Yelisey L. D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.