Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | MACARTY Jordan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 2 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 3 | PRIHODKO Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
| 3 | TSE Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
| 5 | LAI Boden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 5 | TRULL A.J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 47% |
| 7 | GINZBURG Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 27% |
| 8 | XIA Dashan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
| 9 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
| 10 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 6% |
| 11 | LAI Aedin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 60% |
| 12 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 31% |
| 13 | LEE Stewart S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% |
| 14 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 15 | JIANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% |
| 16 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 17 | GOHEL Dayus T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 18 | SAVORETTI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 59% |
| 18 | KABA Elias | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | HE Xiangrui | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% | 14% |
| 21 | FENG Du | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | CHEN Allen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 23 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | PETERSEN Zachary | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | - |
| 25 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | TRAN Spencer | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 3% |
| 27 | ZOU Xianyang (Max) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% | 12% |
| 28 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 4% |
| 29 | ZHAO Pierce | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 30 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 31 | DU Yifan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 32 | CHEN Jayden | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 33 | WANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 33% |
| 34 | WU Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 35 | BRASSARD Calvin | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 35 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 37 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
| 38 | WANG Xiangdong | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 39 | SONG Troy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 26% |
| 40 | KELLEY Hayden | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | LIN Nathan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% |
| 42 | KARIMOV Amir | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | |
| 43 | LECUYER-SCHOONMAKER Declan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 44 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 45 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 46 | NGO-D'ANDRE Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 1% |
| 47 | CHEN Edward | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 48 | NG Rygel | 100% | 96% | 70% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 49 | CHEN YiHeng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 5% |
| 50 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 1% |
| 51 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 52 | MEN Junda | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | 2% |
| 53 | DOWD Peter L. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 54 | SHA Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 6% |
| 55 | YU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 56 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | ZHANG Dinghao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
| 58 | FEINBERG James Y. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 22% | 3% | |
| 59 | IPPOLITO-JOHN Matteo | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 60 | RVACHEV Michael | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 61 | CLEARY Owen | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | GOON Tristan Yang | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 61 | SIALA Omar | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 64 | GUNDUBOGULA Saket | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | ZENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 38% | 6% |
| 66 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 67 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% | |
| 68 | KOPPENHEFFER Rowan | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
| 69 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | 3% |
| 70 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
| 71 | BEALS Alden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 17% |
| 72 | NUTOVYCH David | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 73 | WANG-SONG Evan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 73 | MASSE Jack | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 75 | CHEN Luowen | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 22% | 2% |
| 76 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | 4% |
| 77 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 95% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - |
| 78 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 79 | PESSIN Nadav | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 80 | BAJAJ Nakul | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 81 | MOSKOWITZ Martin | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 82 | MORI Seneca | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 83 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 93% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 84 | LI Jade | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% |
| 84 | MECHREFE Anthony | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 86 | PAN Anthony | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 87 | ZOGRAFOS Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 88 | MAGLOTHIN Atticus | 100% | 84% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 89 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 90 | MITSCH Aubrey | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 91 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
| 92 | SHAPIRO Natan | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 93 | MASSE Dean | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 94 | TANG Jeremy | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 95 | WHITE Aidan | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 95 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 95 | LIN George | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 98 | MCMILLAN Jackson V. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 98 | GU Eric | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 100 | HE Yurui | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 101 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 89% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 102 | ZHANG Marcus Xuanwei | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 103 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 78% | 28% | 3% | - | - |
| 104 | ALAM Rajan | 100% | 77% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
| 105 | LI Ray | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 106 | LIU Fengqi | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 107 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 108 | OSHIMA Robert | 100% | 57% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | WU Chi Kuan | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 108 | JESSER Daxton | 100% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 111 | AU Joshua | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 112 | OTTAVIANO Aaron | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 113 | KOPELMAN Taylor | 100% | 73% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.