October NAC

Div I ME Classification Event

Sunday, October 14, 2018 at 1:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ROGAK Benjamin A. 100% - - - - < 1% -
2 WATRALL Rick 100% - < 1% - - - -
3 DINKINS Ramadan 100% - - - - < 1% -
3 LAURON Sean M. 100% - - - - - < 1%
5 LEIGH David A. 100% - - - - - < 1%
6 KIMATIAN Harrison J. 100% - - - < 1% - -
7 FREIMAN Samuel (Sam) E. 100% - - - < 1% - -
8 PICARD Christopher (Chris) W. 100% - < 1% - - - -
9 XIAN Riley 100% - - - - < 1% -
10 ARIETA Ryan T. 100% - - - - < 1% -
11 SUVOROV Yuly 100% - - - < 1% - -
12 GERAGHTY Michael P. 100% - - - < 1% - -
13 ALVIOR Joshua Aethan B. 100% - - - < 1% - -
14 DAVIES Morgan 100% - - < 1% - - -
15 HUEMER Jackson D. 100% - - < 1% - - -
16 MALYSZ Anthony J. 100% - - < 1% - - -
17 YOON Sungho 100% - - - - - < 1%
18 HUGHES Levi H. 100% - - - - < 1% -
19 KOKENGE Clark 100% - - - - < 1% -
20 GAIDAR Daniel B. 100% - - - - < 1% -
21 MALDONADO Julian A. 100% - - - < 1% - -
22 SHINHOLSTER Michael J. 100% - - - < 1% - -
23 OH Kevin Y. 100% - - - < 1% - -
24 SHIN Sung 100% - - - < 1% - -
25 STOTT Donovan R. 100% - - - < 1% - -
26 ELLIS Yehia S. 100% - - - < 1% - -
27 MALIASSOV Nikita S. 100% - - - < 1% - -
28 XU Zitong (Evan) 100% - - - < 1% - -
29 COTTER Alexander J. 100% - - < 1% - - -
30 PROCTOR Oliver L. 100% - - < 1% - - -
31 SHORT Salim (Sal) A. 100% - - < 1% - - -
32 SHUSTER Joshua 100% - - < 1% - - -
33 TAE William G. 100% - - - - - < 1%
34 REID Avo 100% - - - - < 1% -
35 CONNOR Ryan T. 100% - - - - < 1% -
35 SITBON-TAYLOR Noe B. 100% - - - - < 1% -
37 KEHOE James E. 100% - - - - < 1% -
37 HSING Lucas W. 100% - - - - < 1% -
39 BLYTH Jourdain L. 100% - - - < 1% -
40 LEE Aaron Y. 100% - - - < 1% -
41 YAN yuheng 100% - - - < 1% - -
42 FEINBERG Gabriel M. 100% - - - < 1% - -
43 LEVY Zachari I. 100% - - - < 1% - -
44 ZACHARAKIS Demetri K. 100% - - - < 1% - -
44 WHITE Khristopher E. 100% - - - < 1% - -
46 MAYER Vinzenz 100% - - - < 1% - -
47 ANA Ionut (Johnny) A. 100% - - - < 1% - -
48 WALKER IV Weymouth D. 100% - - - < 1% - -
49 SANCHEZ Lorenzo J. 100% - - - < 1% - -
50 JEONG Connor 100% - - < 1% - - -
51 DANZIG Jacob S. 100% - - < 1% - - -
52 SZABO Benedek H. 100% - - < 1% - - -
53 COLE Wyatt M. 100% - - < 1% - - -
54 KIM Juni C. 100% - - < 1% - - -
55 GHAZALEH Thomas Xavier 100% - - < 1% - - -
55 FULLER George K. 100% - - < 1% - - -
57 GASPAROVICH IV George M. 100% - - < 1% - - -
58 ZHANG Joshua 100% - - < 1% - - -
59 SHUGART Henry R. 100% - - < 1% - - -
60 SHAFAIE Ali 100% - - < 1% - - -
61 MELCHER Jack H. 100% - < 1% - - -
62 WOZNIAK David 100% - < 1% - - - -
63 CULLEN Daniel F. 100% - < 1% - - - -
64 JAYENDRA Chandrashekar 100% - < 1% - - - -
65 VERMEULE Spencer 100% - - - < 1% - -
66 TAFOYA Devin D. 100% - - - < 1% - -
66 SHUR Yakov C. 100% - - - < 1% - -
68 WANG Nathan 100% - - - < 1% - -
69 MECHKOV Iliya 100% - - - < 1% - -
70 LOCASALE Nicholas A. 100% - - - < 1% - -
70 MA Ark 100% - - - < 1% - -
72 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. 100% - - - < 1% - -
73 SMITH William K. 100% - - - < 1% - -
74 WEISSMAN Kai E. 100% - - - < 1% - -
75 MCCHESNEY Colin J. 100% - - - < 1% - -
76 NIEBERGALL Colin G. 100% - - - < 1% - -
77 JIA Chengming J. 100% - - - < 1% - -
78 ZHANG Eric 100% - - - < 1% - -
79 SINAI Nathan G. 100% - - - < 1% - -
80 DOLGONOS Mark 100% - - - < 1% - -
80 MARAKOV Allen B. 100% - - - < 1% - -
82 CARVALHO Daniel S. 100% - - - < 1% - -
83 SIDEWATER Matthew 100% - - < 1% - - -
84 NEU Matthew B. 100% - - < 1% - - -
85 KAMBESELES Jack M. 100% - - < 1% - - -
86 BRADLEY Noah W. 100% - - < 1% - - -
86 SHARMA Sanil 100% - - < 1% - - -
88 GIBSON Nowell L. 100% - - < 1% - - -
89 BROUGHTON Josiah W. 100% - - < 1% - - -
90 BRUNET Nathan 100% - - < 1% - - -
91 RUSSANOV Boris J. 100% - - < 1% - - -
92 INSLER Gabriel C. 100% - - < 1% - - -
93 LEE Timothy S. 100% - - < 1% - - -
94 TOPAZ Nicholas 100% - - < 1% - - -
95 MU Lejia 100% - - < 1% - - -
96 SEABURY Maxwell G. 100% - - < 1% - - -
97 SPIER Julian H. 100% - - < 1% - - -
98 VERNACHIO Anthony 100% - - < 1% - - -
98 LENDER David 100% - - < 1% - - -
100 SNYDER IV William B. 100% - - < 1% - - -
101 LIANG Aaron 100% - - < 1% - - -
102 LEI Joshua 100% - < 1% - - -
103 YOON Nathan 100% - < 1% - - -
104 KIM Derek D. 100% - < 1% - - - -
105 VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik 100% - < 1% - - - -
106 NG Alexander M. 100% - < 1% - - - -
107 AITKEN Andrew W. 100% - < 1% - - - -
108 ZHANG William 100% - < 1% - - - -
109 REINER Julius J. 100% - < 1% - - - -
109 KIM Ethan S. 100% - < 1% - - - -
111 HILBERT Xavier 100% - < 1% - - - -
112 MOGILEVICH Michael 100% - < 1% - - - -
112 DEO Ameya 100% - < 1% - - - -
114 DRAKE Owen G. 100% - < 1% - - - -
115 BODON Michele I. 100% - < 1% - - - -
116 HAYENGA Gary M. 100% - < 1% - - - -
117 SYED Saif M. 100% - < 1% - - - -
117 NOLL Mischa (michael) 100% - < 1% - - - -
119 CORBAN Michael Y. 100% - < 1% - - - -
120 DAO Matthew M. 100% - < 1% - - - -
121 BURKE Matthew C. 100% - < 1% - - - -
122 ALAIMO Charles 100% - < 1% - - - -
123 CORDIE David R. 100% - < 1% - - - -
124 CORRALES Manuel F. 100% - < 1% - - - -
125 LIM Timothy D. 100% < 1% - - - -
126 PAOLINI Nathan R. 100% < 1% - - - - -
127 KIM Ethan J. 100% < 1% - - - - -
128 ROY Joseph T. 100% < 1% - - - - -
129 MCKINLEY Liam K. 100% < 1% - - - - -
130 CONKLIN Jim 100% < 1% - - - - -
131 KONERT Alex T. 100% < 1% - - - - -
132 WOZNIAK Sebastian 100% < 1% - - - - -
133 GREEN Jake L. 100% < 1% - - - - -
134 BRENNAN Charles F. 100% < 1% - - - - -
135 DALY Conor 100% < 1% - - - - -
136 GUO Austin S. 100% < 1% - - - - -
137 IVAKIMOV Vasil 100% < 1% - - - - -
138 MCDERMOTT Brian 100% < 1% - - - - -
139 BEACH Nicholas 100% - - - - - -
140 CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) 100% - - - - - -
141 TIERNEY Luke 100% - - - - - -
142 ALI Adam 100% - - - - - -
143 SWANSON Dave 100% - - - - - -
143 REPP Andrew J. 100% - - - - - -
145 KRIEGISCH Jacob A. 100% - - - - - -
146 CORRALES Nikolas 100% - - - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.