Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MANN Jake R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | SVERDLOV Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 37% |
| 3 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 3 | DOUBOV Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 8% |
| 5 | LE BORGNE Matthieu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
| 6 | ZHAO Zidong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% |
| 7 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 5% | |
| 8 | BRADSHAW Carter | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 9 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% |
| 9 | CHEMEZOV Trent | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
| 11 | HU Robert J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
| 12 | JORDAN Anton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 13 | TIKHONOV Ilia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 32% | ||
| 14 | PETROW Zoryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 15 | YI Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 25% | 2% |
| 16 | DUAN Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 21% | |
| 17 | DAVIDENKO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% | |
| 18 | TIKHONOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 19 | CHUNG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 20 | TATE William Isom | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 21 | SU Caleb | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 22 | JEONG Arisu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | CHEN YiHeng | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 24 | BUI Henry | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | |
| 25 | MEGGERS Davin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
| 26 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
| 27 | RUSSELL James | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 28 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | ||
| 29 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 30 | YU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 31 | WONG King-Yee | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 7% | ||
| 32 | YANG Alex | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 35 | ESPINAL DAPIC Nicolas | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | YIN Chujun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 37 | KIM Joshua | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 38 | LIDSKY Phineas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | XIE Brandon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | |
| 40 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 41 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
| 42 | MODULLA Yathin R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 20% | ||
| 43 | GLOGOWSKI Konrad | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 44 | MODANLOU Navid | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 45 | NOLAN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 46 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 47 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 1% |
| 48 | LEE Anton | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 49 | JONES Jackson | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 50 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 51 | WANG Kaiyan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% | |
| 52 | KONG Brandon | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 53 | RAPALSKI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 54 | LEECH Braedan | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | ||
| 55 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 56 | CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 57 | KIM Gene | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 58 | KIM Zac | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | WATERS Nathaniel | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 60 | PARKS-GOOD Tyler | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | CLICK Tristan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 62 | ZHU Aaron | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
| 63 | WANG Aiden | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 64 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SUH Aiden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 66 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 67 | KE Sebastian | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
| 68 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 69 | LIN Haley | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 71 | LORENZ Nathan | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 72 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 84% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | KLINKENBERG Patrick | 100% | 69% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | CUMMINGS Owen | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 75 | YAP Nathan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 76 | CHENH Justin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 78 | DURAN Sevan Sebastian | 100% | 63% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 79 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | PERI Mourya | 100% | 46% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 80 | URIA Sullivan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 82 | ZHOU alex | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 83 | CUTHBERTSON Dax | 100% | 78% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 84 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 58% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | STEPANIAN George | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 85 | KARLEKAR Veer | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | SZIEDE Kieran | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | RAMEY Daylon | 100% | 56% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 89 | DAVIS Jack | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 90 | STRAFFORD Andrew | 100% | 57% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | SARICH John F | 100% | 85% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | MACTOUGH Ben | 100% | 63% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.