Burlington, NJ - Burlington, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% |
| 2 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
| 3 | MARX Oscar L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 33% |
| 3 | GEOGHEGAN Ronan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 5 | LI Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 30% | |
| 6 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 7 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 57% |
| 8 | PAE Jonathan L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% |
| 9 | LIANG Lixi (Henry) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% |
| 10 | RUSADZE Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 68% | 22% |
| 11 | PAE Brian L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
| 12 | DAI Jonathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% |
| 13 | GRAHAM Roy J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 38% |
| 14 | AHN Jun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 37% | 8% |
| 15 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
| 16 | AUGUSTINE Aaron A. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | ANTON Nathaniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 12% |
| 18 | TOLBA Abdelrahman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 11% |
| 19 | ORVANANOS Jorge | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 8% | |
| 20 | PO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | |
| 21 | MARX Jackson L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 22 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 2% |
| 23 | GUO Sean | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 24 | LI Ayren | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 25 | BASOK Nikita | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 26 | WU Alexander | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 6% | |
| 27 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 4% |
| 28 | HONG Issac | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 29 | JIANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 7% | - |
| 30 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | OTTO Nathaniel B. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | ACHILOV Sayid | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 33 | LI Yao (Liam) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - |
| 34 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 33% | 4% |
| 35 | PROMRAT Pete | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 36 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 37 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 4% |
| 38 | ZHOU Leon | 100% | 94% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | 5% | - |
| 40 | LI Jinghua E. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SONG Bryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 42 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 7% | 1% |
| 44 | TAHOUN Mostafa | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 45 | GUO Justin | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
| 46 | KNIZHNIK David | 100% | 92% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | MALHAM Andrew | 100% | 77% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | MENG Zhaoyi | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | KOVACS Wyatt | 100% | 69% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 52 | MASTROPAOLO Jonah W. | 100% | 78% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | HESS Jason | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 54 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 55 | XU Ethan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 55 | TIKHAEV Alexander | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 58 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 58 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 60 | WANG mason | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | XIANG Derrick | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 62 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 63 | LIEW Jeremy K. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | ZHANG zican | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 65 | WANG Julang | 100% | 84% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | CHOO Christopher Y. | 100% | 70% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 67 | LIU Ryan | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 68 | SANDHU LERNER Armaan S. | 100% | 47% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.