National Championships and July Challenge (Summer Nationals)

Cadet Men's Foil

Wednesday, July 2, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Baird Center - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 SENIC Lucas - - - - 2% 21% 77%
2 LIN Youlong - - - - 6% 39% 55%
3 CHEN Kyle P. - - - 4% 30% 66%
3 FUKUDA Diego - - 3% 14% 32% 36% 15%
5 LIU Derek - - - - 4% 27% 69%
6 RASMUSSEN Sage - - - - 6% 33% 60%
7 BUDOVSKYI Borys - - - - 6% 34% 59%
8 NICOLETTI Luca - - 1% 15% 44% 40%
9 WU Alber Y. - - - 1% 10% 42% 47%
10 CHENG Ethan - - - 2% 14% 40% 44%
10 ZOU QINGCHU - - - 2% 12% 41% 45%
12 WANG Aaron - - - - 3% 28% 68%
13 CORTRIGHT Skipper - - - 1% 7% 34% 58%
14 LEE Christopher T. - - 1% 9% 30% 42% 18%
14 LING Eddie - - - 1% 9% 36% 54%
16 YU Jason - - - - 4% 30% 65%
17 YI William W. - - - 2% 11% 38% 49%
18 LI Bradley - - - - 3% 25% 73%
19 SUAREZ Adrian - - - 4% 19% 42% 35%
19 LU Royce - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
21 ROZALSKI Eli - - 2% 13% 42% 43%
22 HAYES Stewart - - 5% 39% 55%
23 LE Jacob H. - - - 4% 22% 48% 26%
23 CHEN Nuo - - 1% 5% 24% 47% 23%
25 PARK Rion - - - 5% 21% 43% 31%
26 DOELL Ethan - - 1% 5% 23% 43% 28%
27 QIAN Jason H. - - - - 5% 33% 62%
28 WANDJI Noah - - 6% 28% 48% 17%
29 CHANG Jonathan - - 4% 25% 44% 24% 3%
30 SOTO-ULEV Aden A. - - 1% 12% 39% 40% 8%
31 ELKOUSY Zain al Din - 1% 8% 24% 37% 25% 5%
32 YE Neilson - - - 5% 25% 50% 20%
33 TAN Aidan - - - 1% 13% 47% 39%
34 XU Andy P. - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
34 CHEN Matthew - - - 5% 39% 56%
34 ZHOU Chenqiao - - - 2% 16% 48% 33%
37 CHOI JIAN - - - 1% 8% 38% 53%
38 NGUYEN Martin - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
38 ZHANG Jacob - - 1% 9% 30% 43% 18%
40 SHENG Dalton - - 2% 17% 45% 35%
41 LIU Ethan - - - 1% 14% 45% 40%
42 CHOI Ethan - - 1% 8% 39% 52%
43 LI Toby Muhua - - - - 7% 40% 52%
44 MARTIN Darius - 1% 6% 29% 47% 17%
45 LEE Brendan - - - - 3% 26% 70%
46 HOWLAND Jonas - - 2% 17% 56% 25%
47 DONG Richard - - - 4% 22% 49% 26%
48 CHENG Logan - - 1% 8% 30% 44% 17%
48 WU Brian - 1% 10% 39% 39% 11%
50 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas - - - 4% 24% 51% 21%
51 LI Aaron - - - 2% 14% 46% 39%
52 LU Kevin - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 7%
53 SIMONOV Timofey - - - 4% 25% 49% 21%
54 ZHANG Aaron - - - 2% 16% 48% 34%
55 GHEDINI Luca - - 2% 11% 33% 41% 13%
55 BOESKIN Nolan - 1% 8% 27% 39% 22% 3%
57 YUAN Zhihe - - 3% 16% 37% 36% 8%
58 JIMENEZ Naveen - 1% 10% 35% 44% 10%
59 MORROW Brenden - - 1% 11% 38% 42% 8%
60 TOEWS Jackson - 4% 26% 39% 24% 6% -
61 MAZAHERI Fletcher - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 20%
62 ZHOU Shawn - 1% 11% 34% 38% 13% 1%
63 NEICE William - 1% 9% 30% 38% 18% 3%
64 ZHENG Marcus - < 1% 4% 18% 38% 33% 7%
65 RAUTUREAU Hugo - - - 2% 13% 44% 41%
66 GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) - - - 4% 20% 43% 32%
67 YOON Junhyeok - - 2% 13% 40% 39% 6%
68 KO Caleb - 1% 9% 30% 41% 17% 2%
69 PARK Steve (Sangmin) - - 1% 10% 33% 42% 13%
70 TANG Alexander L. - - - 4% 19% 44% 33%
70 MCKEE Calvin - - 3% 17% 42% 33% 5%
72 KIM Daniel Y. - - - 2% 16% 49% 32%
73 OZAWA Taishi - 1% 7% 30% 43% 18% 2%
74 YAO Bradley - - - 1% 9% 36% 53%
75 ALLEN Henry G. - - 1% 11% 35% 44% 9%
76 HARROCH Faustin - 2% 11% 33% 39% 14% 1%
77 LOZANO Veyron Jericho - - 3% 17% 40% 33% 8%
78 TAN Xinlai - 1% 12% 40% 35% 10% 1%
79 LI Daniel - 3% 19% 37% 29% 10% 1%
80 SISINNI Leonardo - 4% 20% 40% 29% 6% -
81 PARK William - 5% 20% 35% 28% 10% 1%
82 LU Nathan - 1% 6% 21% 37% 29% 7%
83 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn - - 3% 17% 37% 33% 9%
84 BAE Eugene - - 1% 7% 27% 43% 23%
85 ZHOU Ryan - - 5% 23% 40% 27% 5%
86 WONG Braxton 5% 21% 35% 27% 11% 2% -
87 LI Richard - 1% 11% 34% 40% 13%
89 CHEN Junlin - - - 1% 8% 38% 53%
90 SHIN Noah - 1% 8% 30% 39% 19% 3%
91 LO Preston - - - 1% 11% 40% 48%
92 CHUANG Oscar - - 1% 7% 31% 46% 15%
93 GUTH Joseph - - 8% 36% 42% 13%
94 ZHAO Nathan - 2% 12% 32% 36% 16% 2%
95 RODRIGUEZ Tyler - 1% 6% 26% 42% 22% 3%
96 TOYOFUKU Ethan - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
97 LI Lucas - - 6% 26% 43% 22% 3%
98 CHO Xzander - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
98 CHA James 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9% 1%
100 ZHAO Adam - 1% 9% 27% 38% 21% 3%
101 CHEN Ethan - - 4% 18% 38% 32% 7%
101 GATES Combustion 1% 12% 39% 35% 11% 1% -
103 CHANG Eric Jonathan 1% 8% 28% 37% 21% 4% -
104 KUE Temujin 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
105 WANG Elijah (QiChen) - 2% 12% 35% 39% 11% 1%
105 CHOI Colin - 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
107 WONG Evan - 1% 5% 22% 40% 29% 3%
108 BERNARD Cohen 1% 9% 28% 38% 21% 4% -
109 CHONG Tristan - 1% 6% 25% 44% 23% 2%
109 FANG Haoyu - 1% 12% 34% 36% 15% 2%
111 CHEN Hanson - - 1% 10% 40% 49%
112 RAJ Jay - - 5% 26% 46% 22%
113 JIN Andy - 13% 41% 35% 10% 1%
114 HARRIS Julien 4% 22% 42% 26% 5% -
115 ABRAMKIN Tim - 2% 15% 40% 34% 8% 1%
116 BIELER Mason - - 3% 16% 38% 37% 6%
117 GORDON William L. - 4% 17% 34% 32% 12% 1%
118 BEDWORTH Alistair 14% 40% 33% 11% 2% - -
119 MAO Lucas - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 13%
120 HICKEY Connor - 2% 15% 41% 33% 8% 1%
121 CHOI Benjamin - 3% 20% 42% 28% 7% 1%
122 CHEN mitchell lixuan - 5% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
123 LAO Kevin 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
124 HUA Aaron 1% 8% 30% 42% 17% 2%
125 UPENDER West 5% 22% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
126 KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. 3% 22% 37% 27% 10% 2% -
127 ZOU Aaron - 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 6%
128 JACOB Ezra 11% 33% 35% 16% 3% - -
129 DERRICK Blake - - - 1% 12% 41% 45%
130 FUKUDA Brando 1% 7% 25% 37% 24% 6% -
131 XIE Jicheng - - 4% 19% 43% 30% 4%
132 LEE Abin - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
133 LI Edison M. - - 4% 21% 44% 26% 4%
134 NISHIHIRA Tyler 1% 10% 32% 36% 17% 4% -
135 PALMA Nathan Anthony - - 1% 10% 36% 43% 10%
136 HART-SYED declan - 4% 18% 36% 31% 10% 1%
137 TSAY Jordan R. - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
138 WAYBRIGHT Matteo 1% 7% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
139 YU William - 2% 13% 41% 34% 9% 1%
139 YANG David H. 9% 31% 37% 19% 3% - -
141 ZHONG Maxwell - - 1% 11% 36% 40% 11%
142 HAN Alexander 1% 6% 24% 40% 24% 5% -
143 BAI Austin - 2% 13% 33% 35% 14% 2%
144 DESERANNO Leander - 1% 8% 33% 42% 15% 2%
145 LU Alex - 1% 16% 56% 26%
146 GRUNENWALD Henri 5% 25% 41% 24% 5% -
147 ZHAO Brian 1% 6% 26% 41% 22% 4%
148 LIM EUNSEONG - 6% 29% 43% 19% 3%
149 PETROV Mikhail 2% 26% 43% 24% 4% -
150 RAUTUREAU Arthur - 1% 5% 18% 36% 32% 9%
151 HUYNH Matthew 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 5% -
152 WANG Rory - - 2% 17% 40% 33% 7%
153 KWON Chase 4% 25% 43% 23% 4% - -
154 ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
155 CHOI Ethan - 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% -
156 ZENG Rick - 1% 5% 22% 38% 27% 6%
157 MCMILLIAN Harrison 1% 10% 32% 38% 16% 2% -
159 PE Noah 1% 11% 36% 41% 9% 1%
160 MARTIRE Luca - 5% 26% 42% 23% 4% -
161 ONIK Ari N. 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
162 TANG Royce 1% 15% 43% 31% 8% 1% -
163 TEH Tang-Ngu 1% 13% 52% 29% 5% -
164 HONG Edwin 1% 11% 31% 37% 18% 3% -
164 KAYE Ben 32% 44% 20% 4% - - -
166 ZHANG Jayden 2% 18% 37% 31% 11% 1% -
167 YOU Martin 2% 15% 35% 34% 12% 2% -
168 ZHAO Ryan 3% 19% 37% 29% 10% 2% -
169 LUK Trusten 21% 42% 28% 8% 1% - -
170 SUN Neo 26% 45% 24% 4% - - -
171 CHAN Joseph 2% 12% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
172 GE Felix Fei - 2% 14% 35% 36% 12% 1%
173 ZHANG Hanru 1% 9% 29% 37% 20% 4% -
174 WEI Winston 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
175 YEVDAYEV Tamir 1% 7% 26% 40% 22% 4% -
176 SUSANTO William 2% 21% 43% 28% 6% -
177 HOU Gaven 2% 14% 36% 36% 11% 1%
178 PARK Jayden 14% 39% 34% 11% 1% -
179 KUO Phineas 4% 23% 41% 25% 6% -
180 ALVAREZ Sebastian 29% 50% 19% 2% -
181 CZARNECKI Thomas 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3% -
182 WENGER Liam 20% 44% 28% 8% 1% - -
183 LIU Yinhong - 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
183 FRASER Rhys - 5% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
185 SENANI Arjun - 5% 22% 39% 26% 7% 1%
185 BURAGOHAIN Aiden 22% 45% 27% 5% - - -
187 HONG Derek 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
188 FEDELI Francesco - 1% 8% 24% 37% 25% 5%
188 RUBY Asher 5% 31% 42% 19% 3% - -
190 GAO Andrew 4% 25% 41% 24% 6% 1% -
191 KOVACS Harrison 9% 36% 41% 12% 1% - -
191 LATORRE Leonardo 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
193 TSOI Spencer 1% 10% 30% 37% 19% 3% -
194 DAVIS Benjamin 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
195 MASSIMINO Andrew 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
195 LINEBERRY CADEN 5% 24% 39% 26% 6% 1% -
197 LEONG Wilson Hua 19% 54% 22% 4% - - -
198 SUN Henry 1% 10% 29% 36% 19% 4% -
199 HOLMES Alexiy 1% 12% 34% 35% 15% 2% -
199 ZHANG GAVIN J - 4% 22% 41% 27% 6% -
201 ANDRADE Cedric 20% 43% 29% 7% - -
202 PONTOPPIDAN Erik 6% 32% 43% 16% 2% - -
203 LEE Christopher 10% 36% 39% 13% 2% - -
204 KIM Daniel 4% 30% 42% 20% 4% - -
205 MCCONKEY Tristan 10% 42% 35% 12% 2% - -
206 STELLPFLUG Zachary 26% 49% 21% 4% - - -
207 PARKER Isaiah - 2% 12% 31% 37% 16% 2%
208 KOE Beckett 1% 11% 31% 37% 16% 3% -
208 DIAZ Gabriel 11% 34% 35% 16% 4% - -
210 VADEN Oliver - 1% 7% 24% 39% 25% 4%
210 LI Jake 40% 43% 15% 2% - - -
212 DHOKTE Neev 12% 34% 35% 15% 3% - -
212 YE Jerry 12% 35% 36% 15% 2% - -
212 NUCKLES Caden 3% 18% 35% 29% 12% 2% -
215 WONG Jacob W. 1% 9% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
216 QIAN Zekai 7% 27% 38% 22% 5% - -
216 KARLEKAR Ved 22% 45% 28% 5% - - -
218 UYPECKCUAT Maximillian Trajan 1% 9% 30% 37% 19% 4% -
218 MOCEK Maksymilian 4% 30% 41% 20% 4% - -
220 SHAW Spencer 9% 33% 38% 17% 3% - -
220 SUAREZ David - 3% 16% 40% 33% 8% -
220 LEHTINEN Axel 4% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
223 HE Bourne 27% 45% 23% 5% - - -
223 TOOMRE Kai 1% 14% 34% 34% 15% 2% -
223 HALIM Seif 4% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
226 ZMUDA Aiden 5% 25% 40% 24% 5% - -
227 REYES Yannik 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% - -
228 HE Ryan 11% 33% 36% 17% 3% - -
229 ZHANG Andrew 5% 29% 40% 21% 5% - -
230 LEE Junehyuk 14% 44% 33% 7% 1% - -
231 SU Preston 5% 27% 41% 22% 4% - -
232 KAGAN Noah 5% 25% 39% 25% 6% - -
233 HU Daniel 51% 42% 6% - - -
234 METZ Mason 1% 15% 40% 35% 9% 1%
235 CHENG Mason 6% 33% 49% 12% 1%
236 BHANOT Arjun 24% 46% 24% 5% - -
237 POPOKH Luca 6% 46% 37% 10% 1% -
238 LO Ernest 31% 46% 20% 3% - -
239 GUDIMETLA Siddhanth 19% 43% 29% 8% 1% -
240 FAN Sean 21% 42% 29% 8% 1% - -
241 SHANNON Jack - 1% 7% 30% 39% 20% 3%
242 LING Carson Jr - 2% 15% 36% 34% 12% 1%
243 JABLOKOV Roman 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% - -
244 CHANG Zane 30% 55% 14% 1% - -
246 WILLIAMS Matthew 29% 43% 22% 5% - - -
247 SLAIN Owen 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
247 KOE Declan 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% - -
249 WEI JR Shan 3% 18% 37% 30% 11% 2% -
250 MARISI Gabriel 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9% 1%
251 PLUMMER Waylon 1% 11% 34% 35% 16% 3% -
252 LIM-SEIWERT Tristan 47% 40% 12% 1% - - -
252 CAJERO Luis O. - 6% 26% 42% 23% 3% -
254 CHOI Hunter 12% 40% 35% 11% 1% - -
255 BOWLES Kevin 47% 39% 12% 2% - - -
256 MANIKTALA Suvir 7% 27% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
256 PETINO Leonardo 9% 31% 38% 19% 3% - -
256 HERRERA Xavier 27% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
259 LUKASIK Michael 35% 48% 16% 2% - - -
260 RAMESH Prashvin 14% 44% 33% 9% 1% - -
260 DRAWZ Chase 44% 42% 13% 1% - - -
262 SUNDSTROM Wren 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% - -
263 PAINTER Zachary 23% 45% 27% 5% - - -
263 GRACEY Gavin 12% 38% 37% 12% 1% -
265 O'LEARY Colin 11% 34% 37% 16% 3% - -
265 HARWOOD Gray 12% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
267 MENASCO Juliun 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
267 LEONG Samuel 20% 43% 30% 7% - -
269 BALES Gabriel 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
269 HE Ian 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% - -
269 OH Joshua 16% 38% 32% 11% 2% - -
272 JIN Daniel 2% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
272 FRANCIS Maximillian 49% 42% 8% 1% - - -
274 FOSTERVOLD Castiel 30% 42% 22% 6% 1% - -
275 WEBSTER Liam 14% 39% 34% 11% 1% - -
276 COOK Grant 21% 46% 28% 5% - - -
277 YOUNG Jack 42% 45% 12% 1% - - -
277 FEEHAN Conor 32% 48% 18% 3% - - -
279 LI Andy 16% 40% 32% 11% 2% - -
280 STANSBURY Desmond 40% 41% 15% 3% - - -
281 BERETICH Brian 30% 44% 21% 4% - -
281 CHOI Elliot 36% 47% 15% 1% -
283 FOY Grant 14% 34% 33% 15% 4% - -
283 CHIANG Aiden 12% 37% 37% 13% 2% - -
283 EDWARDS Connor 9% 31% 38% 19% 3% - -
286 KINGSLEY Griffin 9% 32% 38% 17% 3% - -
287 DEPP Edward 32% 44% 20% 4% - - -
288 ONG Nicholas < 1% 5% 21% 40% 29% 6% -
289 AGARWAL Savya 14% 38% 33% 13% 2% - -
290 TAGORE Reyansh 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
291 CHEN Owen 30% 45% 21% 4% - -
291 VERDEJO-BUISSON Nicolas 78% 20% 2% - - -
293 CHUN Zachary 12% 39% 37% 10% 1% - -
293 CHAN William 61% 35% 4% - - - -
293 MARSHALL Kyler 60% 33% 7% 1% - - -
293 FRANCIS Sebastian 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
293 WILEY Conor 10% 36% 36% 15% 3% - -
298 SUN Evan 37% 43% 17% 3% - - -
299 CHENUTULA Abhinav 81% 18% 1% - - -
300 LEE Jayden J. < 1% 5% 21% 37% 28% 8% 1%
300 PHILLIPS Oliver 28% 43% 23% 5% 1% - -
300 LAM Kirin 13% 36% 35% 14% 2% - -
300 THOMAS Noah 59% 34% 6% - - - -
304 HAN Nathan 63% 32% 5% - - - -
305 ZHENG Austin 17% 40% 32% 10% 1% - -
305 WENGER Rowan 23% 51% 23% 3% - - -
307 WEBER Andrew 33% 46% 18% 2% - - -
307 GOGOI Kavi 46% 42% 11% 1% - - -
309 REBNER Parker 59% 34% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.