Neil Lazar Div1/Div2/Veteran ROC

Div I-A Men's Épée

Sunday, August 24, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Southern Connecticut State University (James Moore Fieldhouse) - New Haven, CT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 MOORE Shomari A. V D V V V V V V V V V V V 5.8 5 -0.8
2 ROSE-JONES Simon V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
3 DION Justin E. V V V V V V V V V D 5.9 6 +0.1
3 CHEN Leonardo V V V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
5 XIA Dashan V V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
6 FAICCO Joseph D D V V V V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
7 DOYON - VERDON Gabriel D V V D D V V V V V D 4.4 3 -1.4
8 LIOU Solomon D V D D V V V V V V D 4.6 3 -1.6
9 WU Jonathan V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 SONG Troy V V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
11 CAI Brian V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
12 XIE Brandon V D V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
13 PIASIO Jack E. V V D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 MEHROTRA Neel V D D D V V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
16 DOLMETSCH Max D D V D V D V V V D 4.8 2 -2.8
17 CHEN Zhengyang (Allen) V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
19 SU Caleb D V V V V V V V 5.3 5 -0.3
20 DOELEMAN zeno V V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
21 WANG justin D V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
22 STELTENKAMP Neal V V V D V V V D 2.4 4 +1.6
23 SERAFIN Ben V V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
24 ZHANG William V V D D V V V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
25 LI Jade V D V V V D V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
26 LEHR William D. V V V V D V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
27 AHMED Mohsen D D V V V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
28 HU Robert J. V D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
29 BELLIVEAU Emmett S. V D V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
30 ZHAI Junqi D D V V V V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
31 BELLIVEAU Raven C. D V V V V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
32 SINGLETON Aman D D D D V V V D 2.7 1 -1.7
33 DOUBOV Andrew V V V V V V D 4.1 6 +1.9
34 MELCHER Jack H. V V V V V D D 5.6 5 -0.6
35 ATKINS Levi H. V V V V V D D 5.4 5 -0.4
35 OSMAN Amjad V V V V D V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
37 LIU Adam D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
38 BOUDREAUX James V V V V D V V 4.9 5 +0.1
39 CHOI Paul S. V D V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
40 ACAR Devin V V V D D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
41 GOON Tristan Yang V V D V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
42 PAYNE Massimo V D D V V V D 3.0 3 -
43 CHEN Allen V V V D D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
44 GUO Austin S. V D D V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
45 MARCHANT Albert J. V V V D V D V D 5.2 4 -1.2
46 ZELIN Sam J. V D V D V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
47 MORI Seneca V V V D D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
48 ANAFI Ari V D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
49 SUN Lucas D V V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
50 O'HARROW Tristan C. V V V D D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
51 AYALA Jaime V V D V D D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
52 RIM Eugene V V D V D V 2.6 3 +0.4
53 GAO Victor V V D D D V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
54 VYSOTSKIY Evan V D D D V V V D 3.2 3 -0.2
56 FANG Hanning D V D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
57 CRESPO Nathaniel Justus V V D D D V D 2.0 2 -
58 LI Ryan V D D V D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
59 JENNINGS Adin V D D V D D V D 4.2 2 -2.2
60 HE Bronto D D D V V D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
61 GOON Sin Tong V V D D D D V D 2.8 2 -0.8
62 MA YIXING (Tiger) V D D V D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
63 SCHROEDER III Robert D D D V D D V D 3.7 1 -2.7
64 OTTAVIANO Aaron V D D D D D V D 1.3 1 -0.3
65 STEVENSON Ryan V D V V D V D 2.8 4 +1.2
66 DOYON - VERDON William V V D D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
67 LIU Jeremiah W. D V D V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
68 PARKER Isaiah V V D V V D D 3.7 4 +0.3
69 HELMY Richard D V V V V D D 1.6 4 +2.4
70 YU David D V V V D V D 1.0 4 +3.0
71 BAI Brian D D V D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
72 NALLICHERI Ayaan D D V D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
73 ECKERT Kevin M. V V D V D D D 3.7 3 -0.7
74 WU Jerry D D D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
75 ZHAO Pierce D V V D V D D 2.2 3 +0.8
76 MCDONNELL Nathaniel V D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
77 RUSSELL Edward D D V V D D 3.1 2 -1.1
78 KELLEY Hayden D D V V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
79 HOWARD Jackson D D D D V V D 2.5 2 -0.5
80 GERSEN Jacob D D D V D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
81 JOYNER Braylon D V D V D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
82 SCAPICCHIO Stephen D D D V V D D 2.6 2 -0.6
83 YU Samuel D D V D D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
84 CHU Brandon A. D V D D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
85 HENNESSY Levon D D V V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
86 KAPLAN Maddox V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
87 LEE Henry V D D D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
88 WARD Kofi D V D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
89 GAO "George" Xiaojiang V D D V D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
90 WU Matthew V D D D V D D 1.7 2 +0.3
90 HEISLER Maxfield V D D D D V D 0.8 2 +1.2
92 NUTOVYCH David V D D D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
93 WANG-SONG Evan D D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
94 KIM Zac D V V D D D D 1.0 2 +1.0
95 ZHANG Jonathan D D V V D D D 2.0 2 -
96 RVACHEV Michael D V D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
97 COETZEE Frans M. D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
98 ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman D D V D D 1.9 1 -0.9
99 LAWLOR Lee V D D D D 1.0 1 -
100 RADZIKOWSKI Sam D D D D V D D 2.4 1 -1.4
101 SUH Aiden V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
102 LI Ray D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
103 MCMILLAN Jackson V. D D D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
104 WANG Zhenhai D V D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
105 SMITH Troy H. D D V D D D D 3.3 1 -2.3
106 MANITT Philip V D D D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
107 REELS Eric J. V D D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
108 MOSKOWITZ Martin D D D V D D D 3.0 1 -2.0
109 BANNEN Nicholas D D V D D D D 2.6 1 -1.6
109 SONG Charlie D D D V D D 2.1 1 -1.1
111 ATKINS Elan D D V D D D D 0.4 1 +0.6
112 ALEXANDER Christopher D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5
113 ZHANG GAVIN J D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
114 PANAS Mason D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
115 IANNO Alex D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
115 ST.GEORGE Nicholas D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
117 GREEN Logan D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.