Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIONG Alice | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 2 | CHEN Stephanie | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
| 3 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 3 | YANG Arianna | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | SUN Milly | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 6 | ARNOLD Evangeline | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 7 | WANG Yvonne | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 8 | DU Chloe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 9 | WONG Isabelle | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 10 | LI Ariel | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 10 | SUN Joanna | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 12 | YANG Nina | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 13 | PARKE Jaime | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 14 | DEJOY Leilah | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | DU Chelsea | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 16 | DAI Sophie | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 17 | TRIVULCE Scarlett | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 18 | PAN Zoe | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 19 | CHONG Emma | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 20 | LIU Emma | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 21 | BERESTOVITSKY Eva | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 22 | WANG Yuette | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 23 | VINLUAN Emma | 5% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 24 | REN Harper | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 25 | ZHANG Carina | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 26 | MUKKU Emily | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Phoebe | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 28 | DEFENSOR Ella | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 29 | WANG Kercedes Ye | 8% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | WU Angela | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 31 | DAI Amy | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | GHALI Lina | - | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 33 | SHEN Isabella | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | SANTIAGO Mara | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KEDAN Carmella | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | HALLENBECK Aderyn | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | FLESHER Mia | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | YU Elise | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | SUN Jingyi | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | EDALGO Annabelle | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 41 | YAO Astrid | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 41 | WONG Valerie Tsz Yung | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.