Air Force Cadet Field House - Air Force Academy, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SCHIEK Harrison | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 13% | |
| 2 | MORIN-JIANG Jake | 2% | 17% | 40% | 33% | 8% | ||
| 3 | KIM Jayden | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 27% | |
| 3 | DHAL Leon | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 48% | 28% |
| 5 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 6 | LI Ethan R. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 47% | 13% |
| 7 | CHOI Kaiden I. | - | 2% | 17% | 43% | 38% | ||
| 8 | LI Grayson | 3% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | ||
| 9 | BOUDREAUX James | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
| 10 | LIU Josh | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 11 | MUENKE Magnus | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% | |
| 12 | PETERSON Matthew | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | ||
| 13 | GUO Woody | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 14 | MEHROTRA Neel | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 2% |
| 15 | RICHARD silas | - | 1% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 15% | |
| 16 | ELLISON Harper F. | - | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% |
| 17 | HENSLEY Roran | - | 1% | 16% | 43% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 18 | KARNAS Karol | - | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 63% |
| 19 | XU Thomas | - | - | 5% | 25% | 45% | 22% | 3% |
| 20 | GONZALEZ Kian | - | - | 4% | 24% | 45% | 26% | 2% |
| 21 | SIM Ian | 3% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 5% | ||
| 22 | GADBURY Logan | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 23 | COLEMAN Ian | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | ||
| 24 | KENT V David | - | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
| 25 | MARENCIK Miles | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | LEE Jayden J. | 4% | 27% | 42% | 24% | 4% | ||
| 27 | MARTEGANI Enea | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | ||
| 28 | DENG Destin | 19% | 44% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 30 | SCHWITZER Eliot | 10% | 38% | 37% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 31 | YAO Tristan | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | ||
| 31 | COSGROVE Franklin | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | MCALVANY Dashel | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 34 | DEAN Samuel | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | REID Wesley | 6% | 45% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | EMERSON Zachary | - | 7% | 44% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DAVIDSON James | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | MESSENGER Niko | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | KIM Remington | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 40 | DEAN Isaac | 43% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | GUROLNICK Michael | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 42 | WYLIE Luke | 11% | 39% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | CROY Felix | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | ADAMS Simeon | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.