Elite Sportplex - Waterford Township, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHANG Parker | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 56% | 18% |
| 2 | LIM EUNSEONG | - | - | - | - | 2% | 25% | 73% |
| 3 | WANG Mendy | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
| 3 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 5 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 82% |
| 6 | LIN Lucas | - | - | 4% | 20% | 41% | 31% | 3% |
| 7 | PAN Howard Haoran | - | 1% | 11% | 45% | 38% | 5% | |
| 8 | LI Ryan | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 6% | |
| 9 | LIU Alex | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
| 10 | SLAIN Owen | - | - | 5% | 28% | 48% | 19% | |
| 11 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 5% |
| 12 | ZHENG Lerui | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 40% | 6% |
| 13 | FAN Ze Lin | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 14 | LIN George | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | MURDOCK Koichi | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | |
| 16 | WANG Mingcheng | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 17 | WANG Caleb | - | - | 6% | 29% | 44% | 20% | |
| 18 | CHAU Ivan | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | < 1% |
| 19 | JIN Xueyuan George | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
| 20 | ZHANG Aaron | 1% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 21 | TAN Charlie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 14% |
| 22 | MCCOOL Henry | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | WANG Jaaziel | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | MOON Nolan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 25 | XU Jason | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
| 26 | DHALIWAL Zorawar Singh | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 27 | HYUN Francis | 1% | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 28 | JIAO Daniel | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 29 | MAZAHERI John | - | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 30 | MADDES Gage | - | 3% | 35% | 44% | 16% | 2% | |
| 31 | SU Aiden | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% | |
| 32 | YU Oliver | - | 3% | 31% | 46% | 18% | 2% | |
| 33 | YIN Andrew | 7% | 35% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | LIU Bradley | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 35 | BUCHNER Roland | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | XUAN nathan | 16% | 48% | 30% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MORALES Tycho | - | 4% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 38 | KANAN Noland | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | ZHANG Bryson | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 40 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 41 | MATIYASH Andrew | 62% | 36% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Thomas | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | LIN Abraham | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 44 | KOSCIK-AQUINO Nicholas | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 45 | PU Yikun | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% | 1% |
| 46 | NG Chuck | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 47 | SIN TaeHwan | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | LIM Cayden | 13% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | CORAN Roland | - | 7% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
| 50 | BUCHNER Theodore | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | LEE Sung-Yull | 44% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | PALMERKLEIN Justin | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | LEE Thomas | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 54 | AN Jacob | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 55 | BROWN Rhys | 12% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | JAGANNATHAN Avi | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | CHOU Ryland | 29% | 61% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | MARVEL Elliot | 25% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 59 | LUND Jonah | 76% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 60 | ENOIU Ethan | 52% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 61 | VALERI Ryan | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 62 | NG Harry | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
| 62 | NETESA Lukian | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | SOMAKANDAN Ghuurhu | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.