San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% |
2 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
3 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
3 | LING Eddie | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
5 | NG Micah | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
6 | UHLIG Cole | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 29% | 8% |
7 | NGAI Julian | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 7% |
8 | DERRICK Blake | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 11% |
9 | SONG Matthew | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | < 1% | - |
10 | NICOLETTI Luca | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
11 | ZHANG Jayden | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
12 | MORROW Brenden | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
13 | TSAGAAN Alex | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
14 | WU Alber Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
15 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
16 | TALWALKAR Vedant | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
17 | RUMPLER Donovan | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
18 | PORPORA Oliver | - | 6% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 6% | - |
19 | YUE Jackson | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
20 | CHUN Dashel | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
21 | TSAGAAN Arthur | 31% | 41% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
22 | GORDON William L. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
23 | BAUMAN Colin | 11% | 30% | 33% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | FU Bryan | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
25 | UPENDER West | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
26 | YANG Charles | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
27 | ZHOU Ryan | 3% | 24% | 45% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
28 | BAEK Caleb | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.