San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DIECK Logan O. | V V V D V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | KIM Benjamin I. | V V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 3 | SARKAR Agniv | D V D D V | V V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 5 | KATZ Matheo | V V V D V D | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 6 | PARK Elliot | V V V D D | V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 7 | BAGCHI Aritra | V D V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 8 | BHARGAV Angad | D D V D V | V V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 9 | JIN daniel | V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 10 | GUPTA Karan | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 11 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | D V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 12 | RAMOS Owen | V V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 13 | WRIGHT Christopher | V D V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | FINK August | V D V V D D | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 15 | MONDALA Adrian | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | ZHUANG William | D V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | MING Nathan | D V V V V | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | WILLIS Alan T. | V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | ULINICH Alexander | V V D V V | D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
| 20 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V D V V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 21 | SARKAR Anish | V V D V D | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 22 | ZHANG Nathan | V D V D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | KUO Rylan | V D V D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | PHUKAN Rohin | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 25 | KNUDSEN Travis | V V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | KHAN Muzzammil | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 27 | MALEEV Georgy | V D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 28 | LEE Bryson | D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 29 | ZWICKER Jacob | D D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | ARUN Madhav | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | MOFFATT Bryson | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 32 | LIANG derek | D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 33 | WATT Darren | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 34 | ZHANG Andrew | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | ANDERSON Kai | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 36 | YU Austin | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
| 37 | BURLING Trenor | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.