San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
| 2 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
| 3 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 18% | |
| 5 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 6 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 7 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 8 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 9 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 1% |
| 10 | LEVY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 3% | |
| 12 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
| 13 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 14 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | |
| 15 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% | |
| 16 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% |
| 17 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% | 26% | 4% | |
| 18 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 21% | 1% |
| 19 | FANG Jaden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 20 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 2% |
| 21 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 22 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 23 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | MA Bryant | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 10% | |
| 26 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | - |
| 27 | NG Micah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 28 | LO Preston | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 29 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% | |
| 30 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
| 31 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
| 34 | NGAI Julian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | CHU Colin | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
| 38 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 38% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIU William | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 41 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 44 | LOFTUS Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
| 45 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 46 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 47 | VENKATESH Valen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% | 19% | 2% | |
| 48 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 87% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
| 49 | GOLWALA Yash | 100% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 50 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | SONG Beckett | 100% | 88% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | OSTERHOLT Aiden | 100% | 90% | 50% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | VARI Julian | 100% | 92% | 60% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | QUIGLEY Pierce | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | HUANG Stanley | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 58 | RAHMAN Yousef | 100% | 73% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | RAY Oliver | 100% | 97% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.