Rockland Community College (Eugene Levy Field House) - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% |
| 2 | NG Nico | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 3 | GAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 3 | CHEN Cameron | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 8% | |
| 5 | MANSFIELD Hunter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 6 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 21% | |
| 7 | TUNG Charlie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | |
| 8 | CARPENTER Touma S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 25% |
| 9 | SZCZAPA Lukas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
| 10 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 11 | LIN Qianzhong | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 11 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 13 | CHALLAMEL Hadrien | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 14 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 15 | HENNESSY Levon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
| 16 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% | |
| 17 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 18 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 19 | GILLARD Adan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 20 | BRESLAV Asher | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
| 20 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 22 | LAU LUCAS | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 12% |
| 23 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | THOMAS Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
| 25 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 26 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 27 | LOPATIN Sergei | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 97% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 29 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 8% |
| 30 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 2% |
| 31 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 38% | 7% |
| 32 | QI Bryan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 34 | TANG Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 5% |
| 35 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 36 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | 6% |
| 37 | SHEYDIN Barry | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 39 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% | |
| 41 | SON Isaac | 100% | 90% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | LI Jayden | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | SCHLUBACH Jasper | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 43 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | ZHU Brady | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 46 | KIM Louie | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 47 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 48 | MERHEJ Sean | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 49 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 50 | TOMPA Paul | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 51 | DAND Zahin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 53 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 54 | TANG Jayce | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 55 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 56 | KO Ethan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | NOVAK Luke | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 58 | ZOU Grant | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 59 | YU David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 60 | JIANG Aidan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 61 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 62 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 63 | CHANG Connor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 64 | LIU George | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 65 | ATKINS Elan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 66 | MILOWSKY Majai | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 67 | JAISING Aaditya | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 68 | CARPENTER Taisei | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | ANDERSON Connor | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 70 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
| 71 | PINCIROLI Tommaso | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | YADAV Aarav | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 73 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 74 | DUDDA Kavin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 74 | FRANCK Hunter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 76 | KAZARIAN Matthias | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 90% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 78 | KIM Brendan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 79 | GORE Noah | 100% | 76% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 80 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
| 81 | DUNCAN John | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 13% | 1% |
| 82 | KWON Ryan | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 83 | MARKOWITCH Robert | 100% | 76% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 84 | SORONDO Aidan | 100% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 86 | LEE Ryan | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 87 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 88 | APFELBAUM Noam | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 89 | JEONG Joseph | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 90 | O'BRIEN Michael | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 91 | GREGORY Milo | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 92 | MATHEW Benjamin | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 93 | HERIGSTAD Daniel | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.